Schutte Self-Report Inventory

Schutte, Nicola S.; Malouff, John M.; Hall, Lena; Haggerty, Donald J.; Cooper, Joan T.; Golden, Charles J.; Dornheim, Liane

doi:10.1037/t06715-000

Cited by 38 publications

(73 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Recently, several new measures of emotional intelligence have emerged (Cooper & Sawaf, 1996;Mayer, Salovey, & Caruso, 1997;Schutte et al, 1998). Only one of these, however, the interactive Emotional IQ Test and its paper equivalent, the Multi-Factorial Emotional Intelligence Scale (MEIS; Mayer et al, 2000), adheres to the multidimensional construct of emotional intelligence proposed by the original promulgators of emotional intelligence.…”

Section: Measuring Emotional Intelligencementioning

confidence: 99%

Workgroup emotional intelligence

Jordan

Ashkanasy

Härtel

et al. 2002

Human Resource Management Review

366

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the last decade, ambitious claims have been made in the management literature about the contribution of emotional intelligence to success and performance. Writers in this genre have predicted that individuals with high emotional intelligence perform better in all aspects of management. This paper outlines the development of a new emotional intelligence measure, the Workgroup Emotional Intelligence Profile, Version 3 (WEIP-3), which was designed specifically to profile the emotional intelligence of individuals in work teams. We applied the scale in a study of the link between emotional intelligence and two measures of team performance: team process effectiveness and team goal focus. The results suggest that the average level of emotional intelligence of team members, as measured by the WEIP-3, is reflected in the initial performance of teams. In our study, low emotional intelligence teams initially performed at a lower level than the high emotional intelligence teams. Over time, however, teams with low average emotional intelligence raised their performance to match that of teams with high emotional intelligence.

show abstract

Section: Measuring Emotional Intelligencementioning

confidence: 99%

Workgroup emotional intelligence

Jordan

Ashkanasy

Härtel

et al. 2002

Human Resource Management Review

366

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Specific prior hypotheses about the relationship between WEMWBS and each of the eight scales were developed. The scales included two covering positive and negative aspects of affect (PANAS, SDHS), one covering psychological functioning (SPWB), one overall well-being (WHO-5), two scales measuring life satisfaction (SWLS and the single-item Global Life Satisfaction scale (GLS) [27]), and one scale, the 33-item Emotional Intelligence Scale (EIS) [28] which consists of statements covering appraisal, expression, and regulation of emotion in self and others, and the utilisation of emotions in problem solving. Information about health status was assessed using the EuroQol Health Status Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-5D VAS) [29] which asks respondents to rate their overall health (physical as well as mental) on a 0-100 scale.…”

Section: Validation Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale

Tennant¹,

Hiller²,

Fishwick³

et al. 2007

PsycTESTS Dataset

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The Emotional Intelligence (EI) Scale devised by Schutte et al (1998) is used in this study, which is more suitable compared to BarOn Emotional Quotient Inventory. Beside their experiences, knowledge and skills, emotion play an important role in pushing individual to produce and perform the best.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Emotional Intelligence of Malaysian Academia towards Work Performance

Ngah¹,

Jusoff²,

Rahman³

2009

IES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper describes the research conducted in relating to emotional intelligence of university staff to work attitude. The Emotional Intelligence (EI) Scale devised by Schutte et al. (1998) is used in this study, which is more suitable compared to BarOn Emotional Quotient Inventory. Beside their experiences, knowledge and skills, emotion play an important role in pushing individual to produce and perform the best. Emotion is critical in motivating, persuading, communicating, leading and controlling individuals and groups. The role of EI in employees' work attitude has not been explored in-depth especially in higher institutions which rather focus EI on students and their academic performances. Quantitative method is adopted and questionnaires are distributed among academics and middle-management employees using simple random sampling. The questionnaire has been designed to assess how effectively individual deal with emotion. The findings of this empirical study would highlight the importance of EI in university and give details on EI factors that influence the work attitude among employees. The t-test, correlations and multiple regressions were used to analyze the data. The findings found that EI is positively related to work-attitude. Appraisal and expression of emotion are moderately correlated to job performance and job satisfaction.

show abstract

Schutte Self-Report Inventory

Cited by 38 publications

References 0 publications

Workgroup emotional intelligence

Workgroup emotional intelligence

Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale

Emotional Intelligence of Malaysian Academia towards Work Performance

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About