2000
DOI: 10.1080/713664678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Science: An unreliable friend to environmental education?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
17
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Also the field of science studies offers valuable insights that are addressed in the articles of, for instance, Stables (1998) and Ashley (2000). Acknowledging too that science cannot offer a monological 'truth' that allows escape from the responsibility to have to make choices, highlights the importance of moving beyond instrumental approaches in ESE practice, policy and research.…”
Section: At the Crossroads Of Academic Fields: Routes Into And Out Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also the field of science studies offers valuable insights that are addressed in the articles of, for instance, Stables (1998) and Ashley (2000). Acknowledging too that science cannot offer a monological 'truth' that allows escape from the responsibility to have to make choices, highlights the importance of moving beyond instrumental approaches in ESE practice, policy and research.…”
Section: At the Crossroads Of Academic Fields: Routes Into And Out Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas Sund and Öhman question a universal ethical foundation for dealing with environmental and sustainability issues, Ashley (2000) problematizes an absolute conception of scientific 'truth' in this respect. In his article about the uneasy relationship between science and environmental education, he discusses the powerful yet provisional nature of scientific truth.…”
Section: A Contentious and Politically Sensitive Field Of Scholarshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking a political perspective, change agency practices cannot be reduced to value-free implementation of the proper techno-scientific solutions for unambiguously defined problems. Rather, it is a matter of engaging with the multidynamic complexity of wicked problems, including tensions between stability and change, short term and long term, local and global, rich and poor, etc., without certain foundations based on uncontested scientifically true solutions (Ashley 2000) or universal ethical guidelines (Sund and Öhman 2014).…”
Section: Change Agents and Complex Sustainability Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SpecificaUy, this tracing wUl be constmcted from die works presented by Adams (2001), Ashley (2000), Diduck (1999), Gough and Scott (2001), Hardy (1996Hardy ( , 1999aHardy ( , 1999b, die Panel for Education for Sustainable Development (1998), Rosenbaum and Bressers (2000), and Scott (2001). Despite this Umited domain, considerable variation exists between these theorisations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interest demonstrated in uncertainty by positivists and postpositivists has been clakned to indicate the adoption of a humbler stance by the scientific community with respect to the Umitations of scientific method and scientific knowledge (Ashley, 2000). This adoption of a humbler stance, however, is highly Development, 1998;Scott, 2001).…”
Section: Uncertainty As An Issue Across Environmental Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%