2009
DOI: 10.1038/nbt0609-514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Science communication reconsidered

Abstract: As new media proliferate and the public's trust and engagement in science are influenced by industry involvement in academic research, an interdisciplinary workshop provides some recommendations to enhance science communication.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
281
0
20

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 377 publications
(322 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
6
281
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…Blogs are seen as part of this supposed new era of highly interactive Internet media based on usergenerated content. Blogs on science have been presented as a means to create new relations between scientists and lay publics and to support public and peer scrutiny of new developments in science, thus "fundamentally changing the nature of science communication" (Bubela et al 2010). In some commentaries, however, this view has also been tempered by awareness of the "dubious quality" of much of the information on science available on the web (ibid. )…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Blogs are seen as part of this supposed new era of highly interactive Internet media based on usergenerated content. Blogs on science have been presented as a means to create new relations between scientists and lay publics and to support public and peer scrutiny of new developments in science, thus "fundamentally changing the nature of science communication" (Bubela et al 2010). In some commentaries, however, this view has also been tempered by awareness of the "dubious quality" of much of the information on science available on the web (ibid. )…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Academics are frequently required to communicate their research to funding bodies. Since the Wolfendale committee [26], there has been an increasing drive to communicate research to the public and promote dialogue [5,27]. We believe that public engagement is of particular importance to complex systems research because of its relevance to a wide range of systems in nature, engineering and social sciences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…duration, repeated exposure); and (b) prior knowledge (Waldahl, 2007). Lower knowledge on a particular subject is associated with stronger framing effects (Bubela et al, 2009;Scheufele and Tewksbury, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less knowledge may render the individual more likely to depend on cognitive heuristics, emotions and values disseminated in the media frame (Bubela et al, 2009). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%