2022
DOI: 10.1177/20563051221077019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Science Factionalism: How Group Identity Language Affects Public Engagement With Misinformation and Debunking Narratives on a Popular Q&A Platform in China

Abstract: Misinformation and intergroup bias are two pathologies challenging informed citizenship. This article examines how identity language is used in misinformation and debunking messages about controversial science on the Chinese digital public spheres and their impact on how the public engage with science. We collected an 8-year time series dataset of public discussion ( N = 6,039) on one of the most controversial science issues in China (GMO) from a popular Q&A platform, Zhihu. We found that both misinformati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the emphasis on narrative, another important feature of health-related discussions on social media platforms is individualism, or so-called personalization [37,38]. Individualism-nationalism has also been found to be closely integrated with narrative in understanding and responding to COVID-19 in the Chinese context-some scholars refer to a "nationalist narrative" in terms of COVID-19 [39].…”
Section: Individualism/nationalism and Health-related Behaviour On So...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the emphasis on narrative, another important feature of health-related discussions on social media platforms is individualism, or so-called personalization [37,38]. Individualism-nationalism has also been found to be closely integrated with narrative in understanding and responding to COVID-19 in the Chinese context-some scholars refer to a "nationalist narrative" in terms of COVID-19 [39].…”
Section: Individualism/nationalism and Health-related Behaviour On So...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the original question of Allcott and Gentzkow, our sample indicates more than half (53%) believed "At the third presidential debate, Donald Trump refused to say whether he would concede the election if he lost" versus less than one third (32%) in the negated version. In the original question of Clayton et al, our sample indicates that 80% of the public believes "Presidential candidates should accept the outcome of elections even if 9 As in the United States, there is a growing literature about belief in rumors and conspiracies in China (Chen et al 2020;Chen, Jin, and Shao 2022;Huang 2017;Wang and Huang 2021). 10 We suspect the latter result might be due to poor phrasing in negation on our part.…”
Section: Rumors and Conspiraciesmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Misinformation circulates more readily among homogenous groups or “echo chambers” [ 21 ], and misinformation with culturally specific language to promote “in-group identity” may receive higher engagement [ 22 , 23 ]. Messages broadcasting cultural pride may therefore be more readily amplified within relatively insular groups of South Asian users.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%