2006
DOI: 10.3152/147154306781779145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Science for survival’: biotechnology regulation in Israel

Abstract: Despite its small size, Israel is a global player in biotechnology. This has been made possible by Government initiatives, and by a permissive regulatory framework. Especially at the level of discourse, Israelis generally employ a positive attitude to science and technologies that are controversial elsewhere. In this article, we discuss regulation in agricultural and human biotechnology and argue that the absence of public controversies is because of certain cultural, religious and political narratives that co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Israel technology is highly valued and therefore new tests are rapidly endorsed, with often little discussion of their medical, social, and ethical ramifications. 40 Consequently, the experiences of the participants in our study may not be representative of those of women in other countries with different health systems, views, and cultural backgrounds. In addition, all the participants in our study were well educated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Israel technology is highly valued and therefore new tests are rapidly endorsed, with often little discussion of their medical, social, and ethical ramifications. 40 Consequently, the experiences of the participants in our study may not be representative of those of women in other countries with different health systems, views, and cultural backgrounds. In addition, all the participants in our study were well educated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Although the women acknowledged the lack of efficient surveillance for the early detection of ovarian cancer, the consequence of the procedure, namely, early onset of menopause (given that most participants were premenopausal) meant that it was not an easy decision. In total, four women (37,40,49, and 62 years of age) opted to undergo RRSO after a positive BRCA test result, and one other woman had already undergone oophorectomy for other reasons. The majority of the women (nine) were still unsure of the appropriate timing for RRSO, because they were not yet sure whether they had reached their desired family size, because they were not yet married/had no children, or because they feared the side effects of early menopause.…”
Section: Original Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such uncritical acceptance of NRTs may correlate with the data that suggest that the ‘Israeli’ preimplantation embryo is not a person. Furthermore, Israeli society has been identified as generally trustful of science and technology, which is perceived to guarantee its existence in a hostile environment 43. The status of the ‘Israeli’ fetus also reflects (and is reassured by) the Israeli legal system, which endows human beings with full legal rights only post partum,27 considers some life to be ‘wrongful’,1 and allows late-stage eugenic abortions 1 25–27…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This case study has illustrated some of the social, cultural, historical, laboratory and pragmatic practices which influence how genetic medicine and research have developed in relation to Ashkenazi Jews and its intersection with Jewish identity. Ashkenazi Jews have actively participated in genetic medicine and research because it reiterates a shared history and addresses culturally salient issues such as the survival of future generations (Kahn, 2000;Prainsack and Firestine, 2006;Wailoo and Pemberton, 2006;Prainsack, 2007;Mozersky, 2009). One consequence is that they have become, and continue to be, more researched in relation to breast cancer genetics compared to other populations.…”
Section: Population Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%