Science motivation questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors

Abstract

From the perspective of social cognitive theory, the motivation of students to learn science in college courses was examined. The students-367 science majors and 313 nonscience majors-responded to the Science Motivation Questionnaire II, which assessed five motivation components: intrinsic motivation, self-determination, self-efficacy, career motivation, and grade motivation. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses provided evidence of questionnaire construct validity. The motivation components, especially self-efficacy, were related to the students' college science grade point averages. The science majors scored higher than the nonscience majors on all of the motivation components. Among both science majors and nonscience majors, men had higher self-efficacy than women, and women had higher self-determination than men. The findings suggest that the questionnaire is a valid and efficient tool for assessing components of students' motivation to learn science in college courses, and that the components play a role in students' science achievement. ß

Assessing Science Motivation for College Students: Validation of the Science Motivation Questionnaire II using the Rasch-Andrich Rating Scale Model

“…Glynn et al (2011) argued that these components are mutually interacting and motivate students to encourage, make positive direction, and sustain their science learning. This section illustrates the meaning behind each component and how the components are related to motivation and learning.…”

Investigation of male and female students’ motivational characteristics throughout an introductory physics course sequence

“…We then created a survey to cover the core aspects of each construct but with a goal to minimize total survey length, adapting questions from other well-validated surveys [7,8,[10][11][12][13][14][15]. The final version of the survey has 29 Likert-scale items.…”

Systemizing and the gender gap: examining academic achievement and perseverance in STEM

“…On the other hand, there is ample empirical evidence suggesting that negative emotions are associated with decreased self-efficacy (Akin and Kurbanoglu 2011;Nie et al 2011) and that intrinsic motivation is positively related to self-efficacy (Bryan et al 2011;Glynn et al 2011). Thus, building on our hypotheses regarding systemizing cognitive style, we further expected learning anxiety to negatively predict self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation to positively predict self-efficacy.…”