Science of science

Abstract

BACKGROUND The increasing availability of digital data on scholarly inputs and outputs—from research funding, productivity, and collaboration to paper citations and scientist mobility—offers unprecedented opportunities to explore the structure and evolution of science. The science of science (SciSci) offers a quantitative understanding of the interactions among scientific agents across diverse geographic and temporal scales: It provides insights into the conditions underlying creativity and the genesis of scientific discovery, with the ultimate goal of developing tools and policies that have the potential to accelerate science. In the past decade, SciSci has benefited from an influx of natural, computational, and social scientists who together have developed big data–based capabilities for empirical analysis and generative modeling that capture the unfolding of science, its institutions, and its workforce. The value proposition of SciSci is that with a deeper understanding of the factors that drive successful science, we can more effectively address environmental, societal, and technological problems. ADVANCES Science can be described as a complex, self-organizing, and evolving network of scholars, projects, papers, and ideas. This representation has unveiled patterns characterizing the emergence of new scientific fields through the study of collaboration networks and the path of impactful discoveries through the study of citation networks. Microscopic models have traced the dynamics of citation accumulation, allowing us to predict the future impact of individual papers. SciSci has revealed choices and trade-offs that scientists face as they advance both their own careers and the scientific horizon. For example, measurements indicate that scholars are risk-averse, preferring to study topics related to their current expertise, which constrains the potential of future discoveries. Those willing to break this pattern engage in riskier careers but become more likely to make major breakthroughs. Overall, the highest-impact science is grounded in conventional combinations of prior work but features unusual combinations. Last, as the locus of research is shifting into teams, SciSci is increasingly focused on the impact of team research, finding that small teams tend to disrupt science and technology with new ideas drawing on older and less prevalent ones. In contrast, large teams tend to develop recent, popular ideas, obtaining high, but often short-lived, impact. OUTLOOK SciSci offers a deep quantitative understanding of the relational structure between scientists, institutions, and ideas because it facilitates the identification of fundamental mechanisms responsible for scientific discovery. These interdisciplinary data-driven efforts complement contributions from related fields such as sciento-metrics and the economics and sociology of science. Although SciSci seeks long-standing universal laws and mechanisms that apply across various fields of science, a fundamental challenge going forward is accounting for un...

Success and luck in creative careers

“…This rule explains the variability in the occurrence of creative individuals' best hit. Yet, career hits are not only the results of luck but also of other individual and team properties [11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. While previous literature suggests that luck and individual ability are both necessary to excel in art and science charts [18,19,20,21,22], a quantification of the role of luck across different creative domains is still lacking.…”

Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines

“…Consequently, much of the available evidence on gender disparity is based on case studies limited to subsets of active scientists in specific countries, disciplines, or institutions, making it difficult to compare and generalize the finding to all of science. A further complication arises from the heavy-tailed nature of academia: a disproportionately small number of authors produce a large fraction of the publications and receive the majority of the citations [28], an effect that is exacerbated in 3 small sample sizes [29]. To truly understand the roots of the gender gap, we need to survey the whole longitudinal, disciplinary, and geographical landscape, which is possible only if we capture complete careers for all scientists across disciplinary and national boundaries.Here, we reconstructed the full career of 7,863,861 scientists from their publication record in the Web of Science (WoS) database between 1900 and 2016.…”

Where Are We? Using Scopus to Map the Literature at the Intersection Between Artificial Intelligence and Crime

“…Among the many areas in which network science has shown its potential, stands the field called "science of science". Science of science is the quantitative study of how scientific agents (e.g., authors, universities) interact, focusing on the pathways that lead to scientific discovery and aims at better understanding what drives successful contributions [73]. Given the perfectly fitting nature of networks in capturing relations between entities, network science has, therefore, become a mainstream approach to unfold the characteristics and patterns across scientific domains.…”