2014
DOI: 10.14221/ajte.2014v39n12.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Science Teacher Education Partnerships with Schools (STEPS): Partnerships in science teacher education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our aim was to incorporate new ways of thinking about and practicing science teaching to strengthen pre-service teachers' (PSTs) future capability and confidence to teach science in primary schools. Our research aligns closely with other science educators who modified their practice to create better learning outcomes for PSTs (Lederman & Lederman, 2015) and address PSTs' lack of confidence to teach science (Jones et al, 2016;Kenny et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Our aim was to incorporate new ways of thinking about and practicing science teaching to strengthen pre-service teachers' (PSTs) future capability and confidence to teach science in primary schools. Our research aligns closely with other science educators who modified their practice to create better learning outcomes for PSTs (Lederman & Lederman, 2015) and address PSTs' lack of confidence to teach science (Jones et al, 2016;Kenny et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Enactive mastery experiences are authentic experiences in which one demonstrates the capability to succeed in the task. In studies of preservice primary teachers, mastery experiences have often included successful participation in science teaching practice (Kenny et al, 2014;Mansfield & Woods-McConney, 2012). Roberts and Henson (2000) argued that mastery experiences could also include successful mastery of new information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of mainstay themes in education research within participants' responses was also noteworthy as Time (e.g., AITSL, 2021;Crump, 2005;Jenkinson & Benson, 2010), Cross Curricular Integration (e.g., Gresnigt et al, 2014;Rennie et al, 2018), Specialist Science Teachers (e.g., Ardzejewska et al, 2010;Levy et al, 2016;Mills et al, 2020;Roach & Wendt, 2022), School-University Partnerships (e.g., Hobbs et al, 2018;Kenny et al, 2014) and Preservice Science Education (Deehan, 2017(Deehan, , 2021(Deehan, , 2022 were not widely identified as key factors in the ongoing improvement of Australian primary science education. While a sampling error or methodological limitations could explain the relative paucity of these themes, they could also be an extension of the previously mentioned internal locus of control expressed by teachers as they view themselves, rather than universities or specialist teachers, as being central to the improvement of primary science education.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%