Science to the people! (and experimental politics): Searching for the roots of participatory discourse in science and technology in the 1970s in France

Abstract

The current conception of political participation in governmental institutions is deeply marked by the notions of deliberation and precaution. This normative conception of participatory politics neglects, backgrounds or disqualifies other participatory practices, in so far as they are not connected to deliberation and precaution. However, participation has not always been defined in such a restricted way: the current conception of participation is a product of the 1980s and 1990s. In this paper, the meaning ascribed to the notion of participation in the 1970s in France is explored through the study of discourses produced in three fields: the Science Policy Division of the OECD, the French radical science movement, and the emerging STS academic field. As is shown, some of the bases of the current notion of participation originate in the 1970s. Nevertheless, it is argued that in these years, the notion of participation has more to do with experimentation than with deliberation and precaution. Therefore, the conception of participation in the 1970s differs greatly from the current one. Methodologically, this paper combines tools offered by the social history of science and the French school of discourse analysis.

Science-related populism: Conceptualizing populist demands toward science

“…In doing so, we do not suggest that every criticism of science and its epistemology is an instance of science-related populism. Science-related populism has partial overlaps with other challenges to epistemic authorities, such as radical science movements (Quet, 2014), political or industrial efforts to undermine scientific evidence (Oreskes and Conway, 2010), science denial (Hansson, 2017), anti-intellectualism (Hofstadter, 1963), conspiracy cultures (Harambam, 2017), indigenous epistemologies (Horton, 1967), or religious doctrines (McPhetres and Zuckerman, 2018). 3 But eventually, science-related populism describes one distinct variant of anti-scientific position—a variant that may be increasingly important in the wake of broader populist movements, can be distinguished from political populism, and had not yet been comprehensively conceptualized.…”

From Politics to Academics: Political Activism and the Emergence of Science and Technology Studies in South Korea

“…So antiscience is not popular." 3 In this respect, the 1970s was a golden age for S&T rather than the "long decade of protest" seen in Europe (Bonneuil 2004;Quet 2013). Significantly, the students and teachers who were most involved in the protest movement came mainly from the social sciences and humanities.…”

“…The social history of the critique of science and science studies in Europe and the United States has been told at various stages (Pancaldi 1980;Hess 1997;Rip 1999;Dubois 2001;Quet 2013), along with STS histories that are more indifferent to politics (Bowker and Latour 1987) and texts focusing on the critique of science (Mendelsohn 1994;Petitjean 1998;Peiffer 2000;Agar 2008;Moore 2008) or some aspects of the radical science movement (Rose and Rose 1979;Beckwith 1986;Martin 2000). But this type of history is rarer for the other parts of the world, and while some scholars have addressed Asian, Latin American, and African countries (Elzinga and Jamison 1986;Krishna 1996;Song 1999;Rajan 2005), much remains to be written.…”

Imagining the future through revisiting the past: the value of history in thinking about R(R)I’s possible future(s)

“…Historians of science and technology have examined the 1960s and 1970s as a time when scientists and engineers tried to navigate the complex and changing relationship between science, technology, and society (see e.g. Agar 2008;Turner 2010;Moore et al 2011;Nordmann, Radder, and Schiemann 2011;Kaiser 2012;Wisnioski 2012;Moore 2013;Quet 2014;Kaiser and Patrick McCray 2016;King and Levidow 2016;Mody 2016Mody , 2017Egan 2017;Graf 2017;Heymann 2017). Critiques of this period, especially by people of colour, have also drawn attention to the role of marginalised groups and political movements who played an important role in shaping societal attitudes towards science and technology at the time (see e.g.…”