2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Science with society: Evidence-based guidance for best practices in environmental transdisciplinary work

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
2
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preliminary data from Kibira NP in Burundi also indicates that the Twa are facing a similar situation: no adaptation to climatic changes because limited livelihood options following eviction. To help Twa adapt to climatic changes, we recommend the use of "science with society" (SWS) participative (or transdisciplinary) approach (Steger et al, 2021), an iterative process that brings together actors (including local communities) to engage in knowledge co-production: in this case, to identify the best pathway towards adaptation. Notably, given that Twa are a marginalized remote community, the longer-term actions towards increasing desirable forms of resilience need to take account short-term realities and needs, including food security (Maru et al, 2014).…”
Section: Implications Of the Results And Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary data from Kibira NP in Burundi also indicates that the Twa are facing a similar situation: no adaptation to climatic changes because limited livelihood options following eviction. To help Twa adapt to climatic changes, we recommend the use of "science with society" (SWS) participative (or transdisciplinary) approach (Steger et al, 2021), an iterative process that brings together actors (including local communities) to engage in knowledge co-production: in this case, to identify the best pathway towards adaptation. Notably, given that Twa are a marginalized remote community, the longer-term actions towards increasing desirable forms of resilience need to take account short-term realities and needs, including food security (Maru et al, 2014).…”
Section: Implications Of the Results And Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of growing inequality-particularly during the coronavirus pandemicand wider transformations in Tanzanian society, policies should carefully consider how wealth from subsistence and commercial farming and mixed sector off-farm income can be reinvested in locally produced, employment-intensive goods and services to reduce inequality, secure the livelihoods current and new workers, and drive intensification [90]. Better international cooperation and faster development action is needed to limit the loss of traditional knowledge in mountain farming communities [2,104].…”
Section: Broader Implications For Policy and Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such approaches typically fail to reach mountain communities, overlook the vital importance of context, and mobilise communities' profound attachment to nature from cultivating parcels of land on mountain slopes for centuries [27,65,105]. To identify promising future adaptation pathways, we recommend the use of a 'science with society' participative, transdisciplinary approach [104], an iterative process that brings together actors to engage in knowledge co-production. Appreciating cultural values helps build trust between local peoples and other agencies and provides a closer understanding of differentiated climate hazard exposure, vulnerabilities, risk, and resilience [19].…”
Section: Broader Implications For Policy and Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We define a problem as Pearce and Ejderyan (2020) in the sense that a problem exists when a current state differs from a desired state. The foremost importance of establishing a joint problem for participatory research-when stakeholders and scientists jointly frame the problem at stake-has been repeatedly stated (Hirsch-Hadorn et al 2008;Jahn et al 2012;Norström et al 2020;Steger et al 2021). In practice, this process is rarely documented (Etienne, 2013) as framing the problem itself is mentioned as an important step but the description of real processes are missing (Pearce and Ejderyan 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%