Scientific Argumentation in Chemistry Education: Implications and Suggestions

Abstract

The Malaysia Education Blueprint 2012-2025 reveals the aspiration of government to prepare Malaysian children to meet the challenges of a 21st century economy. Nonetheless, Malaysia has a long way to go to achieve this target. PISA (2015) result indicates that Malaysian students have problems in reasoning skills. To achieve the target, Educational Blueprint advocates infusion of inquiry-based instruction in classrooms for students to acquire critical thinking skill. Critical thinking skill is a 21st century learning skill the students need to possess in today’s global economy. This skill includes the ability of individual to reason effectively. Scientific argumentation is a skill to promote critical thinking of students. Being the essential element of scientific inquiry and important activity in scientific reasoning, scientific argumentation helps students to develop and refine scientific knowledge. It is imperative to implement scientific argumentation in science classrooms. The purpose of this paper aims to raise some issues, including the results of previous studies about the impact of scientific argumentation on science achievement, the rationale for focusing on monological models in the three classification of argumentation models, and address the issues about the appropriateness of Toulmin argument model (an example of monologoical models), which is prevailed in science education to promote students’ scientific argumentation skills. Finally, this paper will outline some suggestions regarding implementation of Toulmin argument model to promote scientific argumentation in chemistry education.

(Im)Possibility of Learning Science Through Livelihood Activities at Community Schools in Nepal

“…In this context, science teachers usually found to be solving the problems of science on the board and students receive teachers' poured content knowledge throughout the class period. Meaningless manipulation of formulas and symbols of elements or chemical reactions are found in practice in the classrooms (Hong & Talib, 2018;Liou & Jessie, 2018;Vedder-Weiss & Fortus, 2018). The practice of the dogmatic approach to teaching science makes students experience monotony and students stereotypically memorize contents as a procedure without any rationale meaning of the contents.…”

A Survey of Toulmin Argumentation Approach for Medical Applications

“…Hong & Abdul Talib in [15] suggested the use of Toulmin's model for promoting scientific argumentation in a chemistry learning. Based on the application of Toulmin's model in science education and the nature of chemistry, the use of Toulmin's model undergoes a further elaboration so as to overcome its limitations.…”

Differences and Relationship Between Attitudes and Self Efficacy of Female and Male Students in Science Subjects in Junior High School

“…Science in the field of education is scientific knowledge and serves as a very important disciplinary knowledge in the field of education. Science learning aims to help students develop critical and creative thinking skills (Wahyudi et al, 2017;Hong & Talib, 2018;Crawley et al, 2019) Natural Sciences (IPA) is a science that can be obtained using the steps of scientific activities such as observation, measurement, formulating, testing hypotheses, collecting data, experimenting and predicting deduction to produce an explanation of a phenomenon that can be trusted (Utaminingsih et al, 2018;Tri Pudji Astuti, 2019;Maison et al, 2020). Science at the SMP/MTs level is packaged in an integrated manner in science science which includes: physics, biology, chemistry, and earth and space sciences and science studies include aspects of products, processes, scientific attitudes and educational applications (Imaduddin & Khafidin, 2018;Wulandari et al, 2019;Cooper & Berry, 2020;).…”