2013
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-394292-0.00006-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scientific Benchmarks for Guiding Macromolecular Energy Function Improvement

Abstract: Accurate energy functions are critical to macromolecular modeling and design. We describe new tools for identifying inaccuracies in energy functions and guiding their improvement, and illustrate the application of these tools to improvement of the Rosetta energy function. The feature analysis tool identifies discrepancies between structures deposited in the PDB and low energy structures generated by Rosetta; these likely arise from inaccuracies in the energy function. The optE tool optimizes the weights on the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
305
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 234 publications
(307 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
305
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Starting from a symmetric array of subunits in a completely extended backbone conformation, the internal, fivefold, and helical DOF were allowed to vary according to the ssNMR restraints and Rosetta energy function. The local backbone and sidechain conformations were sampled using Monte Carlo fragment insertions and rotamer trials that were propagated among the symmetry-related subunits and scored using a physically realistic energy function (52). The selection of candidate backbone fragments from high-resolution structures in the PDB was performed using the ssNMR backbone chemical shifts (53).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting from a symmetric array of subunits in a completely extended backbone conformation, the internal, fivefold, and helical DOF were allowed to vary according to the ssNMR restraints and Rosetta energy function. The local backbone and sidechain conformations were sampled using Monte Carlo fragment insertions and rotamer trials that were propagated among the symmetry-related subunits and scored using a physically realistic energy function (52). The selection of candidate backbone fragments from high-resolution structures in the PDB was performed using the ssNMR backbone chemical shifts (53).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational design and docking were performed using Rosetta (19)(20)(21). A computationally guided ubiquitin library was displayed on the surface of M13 bacteriophage as previously described (22) and selected against the monobiotinylated catalytic domain of USP14 (residues D91-Q494, C114A active site mutation).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explore the conformation and dynamics of ubiquitin's β1-β2 loop, we computationally searched for core positions where mutations are predicted to favor the USP-binding state, using both single-state and multistate RosettaDesign (Methods) (19)(20)(21)(22). Both types of design experiments identified a consistent set of positions for mutation ( Fig.…”
Section: Generation Of Ubiquitin Variants With Increased Affinity Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crystal structure processing and design parameters For structural modeling, Rosetta with the Talaris2013 score function was used (Das and Baker, 2008;Kaufmann et al, 2010;Leaver-Fay et al, 2013;Moretti et al, 2013), using the PyRosetta interface (Chaudhury et al, 2010). Native crystal structures were brought to local energy minima through multiple cycles of backbone minimization and rotamer optimization with heavy atom restraints (Bradley et al, 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%