2017
DOI: 10.33225/jbse/17.16.144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scientific Eponym in Educational Universe

Abstract: Strictly speaking, knowledge for every object in educational Universe is limited by ignorance or, in other words, these two components co-exist. However, pedagogy primarily deals with knowledge, its acquisition and retention. It ignores the ignorance, leaving it as a subject for a more generic science of psychology. Similarly, atomic nuclei in real Universe are a subject for a more generic science of physics, being only slightly studied in chemistry. To research on knowledge is by far easier than on ignorance,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, extensive debates have unfolded regarding the use of eponyms by taxonomists; some have even gone so far as to suggest that taxonomists should abstain from using eponyms altogether, arguing that they constitute a political act that contradicts principles of equality and representation (Guedes et al, 2023). However, we believe, as many other authors do, that eponyms hold particular significance in regions like the Global South, where their elimination could have adverse effects on scientific endeavors in the very region intended to benefit the most from such proposals (Jost et al, 2023; Pethiyagoda, 2023; Slabin, 2023).…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In recent years, extensive debates have unfolded regarding the use of eponyms by taxonomists; some have even gone so far as to suggest that taxonomists should abstain from using eponyms altogether, arguing that they constitute a political act that contradicts principles of equality and representation (Guedes et al, 2023). However, we believe, as many other authors do, that eponyms hold particular significance in regions like the Global South, where their elimination could have adverse effects on scientific endeavors in the very region intended to benefit the most from such proposals (Jost et al, 2023; Pethiyagoda, 2023; Slabin, 2023).…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…These analogies illustrate and visualise the key features of atomic concepts with reference to real-world scenarios (Devecioglu-Kaymakci, 2016), and draw on students' prior knowledge and experience to enable their understanding. Inverse analogies can be productive, too: using atomic structure as the familiar domain, Slabin (2017) applied valence bond and molecular orbital theories to explain formation of educationally valuable chemical eponyms (the unfamiliar domain). As confirmed by Dangur et al (2014), engaging diverse analogies and encouraging connections between scientific concepts and daily life experiences can improve students' understanding of complex concepts (e.g., quantum mechanical concepts).…”
Section: Analogies In the Teaching Of Atomic Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the eponym 'Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer superconductor' means a rather vague designation for a variety of materials [38] that nevertheless have some common features. Such eponyms make scientific texts richer and more human, which is extremely important for education [27,39]. For students, eponyms provide a verbal monument [40] essential to recognizing and respecting our intellectual roots and predecessors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%