2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41893-022-00909-5
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scientific evidence on the political impact of the Sustainable Development Goals

Abstract: In 2015, the United Nations agreed on 17 Sustainable Development Goals as the central normative framework for sustainable development worldwide. The effectiveness of governing by such broad global goals, however, remains uncertain, and we lack comprehensive meta-studies that assess the political impact of the goals across countries and globally. We present here condensed evidence from an analysis of over 3,000 scientific studies on the Sustainable Development Goals published between 2016 and April 2021. Our fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
125
0
6

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
125
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Joint action thus becomes possible without a requirement for consensus (Huvila, 2011). For the SDGs, for example, one study found that '70% of CEOs see the SDGs as a powerful framing to accelerate sustainability-related efforts of their companies' (Biermann et al, 2022). At the same time, city governments may see evidencing progress against the SDGs as an opportunity to strengthen their profile as international, modern and progressive, thereby increasing the city's attractiveness (Mocca, 2017), while activists might see them as a tool to address specific issues, such as girls' education or wetland conservation.…”
Section: Boundary Objects and Wicked Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Joint action thus becomes possible without a requirement for consensus (Huvila, 2011). For the SDGs, for example, one study found that '70% of CEOs see the SDGs as a powerful framing to accelerate sustainability-related efforts of their companies' (Biermann et al, 2022). At the same time, city governments may see evidencing progress against the SDGs as an opportunity to strengthen their profile as international, modern and progressive, thereby increasing the city's attractiveness (Mocca, 2017), while activists might see them as a tool to address specific issues, such as girls' education or wetland conservation.…”
Section: Boundary Objects and Wicked Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of these complexities, insights from existing SDG localisation approaches (Allen et al, 2018) are needed to address the global challenge of the sustainable development of cities and communities (Fan et al, 2022;Leavesley et al, 2022). Recent studies have pointed to the importance of language and meaning in enabling coherence between the different views and interests involved in localising the SDGs in cities (Valencia et al, 2019;Biermann et al, 2022). Relatedly, much prior work in city strategising for sustainability points towards the need to span boundaries (Carlile, 2004) to form and maintain partnerships for change (Huxham and Vangen, 2000;Noble and Jones, 2006;Elmqvist et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GTFCC theory of change for cholera elimination (adapted from: [1]) Despite the commitment of governments and organisations to large-scale strategies, many argue that they fail to produce significant improvements in their goals [2,3]. There have been gains in cholera control at a local level in recent decades, although this has been minimal at the global level [4,5].…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global supply chains and trade feature prominently in these debates as they allow high-income countries to externalize sustainability risks associated with pollution-and labor-intensive production overseas (Wiedmann, Lenzen, Keyßer et al, 2020). Given limited multilateral political momentum (Biermann, Hickmann, Sénit et al, 2022), the onus of unilateral action is on high-income democracies of the Global North.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%