2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2201.05624
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's next

Abstract: Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINN) are neural networks (NNs) that encode model equations, like Partial Differential Equations (PDE), as a component of the neural network itself. PINNs are nowadays used to solve PDEs, fractional equations, and integral-differential equations. This novel methodology has arisen as a multi-task learning framework in which a NN must fit observed data while reducing a PDE residual. This article provides a comprehensive review of the literature on PINNs: while the primary goal o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
(254 reference statements)
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) Regularization approaches in power systems: Many recent results have focused on a particular regularization architecture, known as Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) [32], where partial/ordinary differential equation (P/ODE) functions explicitly regularize NN training. While this technique is relatively new, it has quickly attracted thousands of followup extensions and associated publications [33].…”
Section: Model Training and Physics-based Regularizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) Regularization approaches in power systems: Many recent results have focused on a particular regularization architecture, known as Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) [32], where partial/ordinary differential equation (P/ODE) functions explicitly regularize NN training. While this technique is relatively new, it has quickly attracted thousands of followup extensions and associated publications [33].…”
Section: Model Training and Physics-based Regularizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the main idea behind the PINN is that the governing equation is used, rather than the labeled solution, in the loss function to keep the neural network solution approaching the strong solution of PDEs. PINNs have been successfully used in solving a large number of nonlinear PDEs, including Burgers, Schröinger, Navier-Stokes, Allen-Cahn, high-speed flows, etc [20,37,25,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raissi, et al (2019) introduced the concept of incorporating governing PDEs in the loss function of a deep neural network to solve both forward and inverse problems. Since then, PINN has been used for solving various scientific problems in several domains (Cuomo, Di Cola, Giampaolo, Rozza, Raissi, & Piccialli, 2022) including fluid flow (Cai, Mao, Wang, Yin & Karniadakis, 2022) and heat transfer (Cai, Wang, Wang, Perdikaris & Karniadakis, 2021). A few limitations of the PINNs have been recently highlighted by Cuomo et al (2022) in their review.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, PINN has been used for solving various scientific problems in several domains (Cuomo, Di Cola, Giampaolo, Rozza, Raissi, & Piccialli, 2022) including fluid flow (Cai, Mao, Wang, Yin & Karniadakis, 2022) and heat transfer (Cai, Wang, Wang, Perdikaris & Karniadakis, 2021). A few limitations of the PINNs have been recently highlighted by Cuomo et al (2022) in their review. Even though the inference time for PINN models is considerably low, high training time and significant convergence difficulties in complex scenarios limit their implementation in real life applications .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation