2014
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3857
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scientific Opinion on pest categorisation ofXanthomonas arboricolapv.pruni(Smith, 1903)

Abstract: The European Commission requested the EFSA Panel on Plant Health to perform a pest categorisation for Xanthomonas campestris pv. pruni which has been renamed Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni. In reaching its conclusions, the Panel considered four parameters to be of critical importance in the risk assessment area: (i) the presence and distribution of X. campestris pv. pruni in the risk assessment area and its potential for spread; (ii) the existence and distribution of the main host plants throughout the Europ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The negative effects in the crops are reflected in a yield reduction or in the inability to commercialize the damaged fruit (Lamichhane, 2014; Lamichhane and Varvaro, 2014). The appearance of several outbreaks of these pathovars which, in the case of the pathovars corylina and pruni , are regulated by quarantine policies in areas like the European Union (both pathogens are registered in the EPPO A2 list), and the possibility of future epidemics and spread of these pathogens to disease-free producing zones, have potentiated the efforts to understand the molecular diversity of the species (Anonymous, 2000; EFSA, 2014). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative effects in the crops are reflected in a yield reduction or in the inability to commercialize the damaged fruit (Lamichhane, 2014; Lamichhane and Varvaro, 2014). The appearance of several outbreaks of these pathovars which, in the case of the pathovars corylina and pruni , are regulated by quarantine policies in areas like the European Union (both pathogens are registered in the EPPO A2 list), and the possibility of future epidemics and spread of these pathogens to disease-free producing zones, have potentiated the efforts to understand the molecular diversity of the species (Anonymous, 2000; EFSA, 2014). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optical microscopy observation of planktonic and biofilm structure development of strain CITA 33, which was selected as a Xap representative strain, is shown in Figure 3a. (3,4), 24 h of biofilm maturation in dried conditions (5,6), 48 h of biofilm maturation in dry condition (7,8), 72 h of biofilm maturation in dry conditions (9,10), 72 h of biofilm maturation without medium elimination (11,12). (b) CLSM imaging of planktonic cells in LB (1) and XVM2 (2), 48 h mature biofilm in LB (3) and XVM2 (4) and 72 h mature biofilm in LB ( 5) and XVM2 (6).…”
Section: Visualization Of Biofilms In Vitromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xap causes damages on leaves, fruit, twigs, branches and trunks of trees [6] and gradually heavily infected trees become uneconomic because of severe defoliation resulting in weakened trees and damaged fruit which are often unmarketable. Yield losses of up to 75% have been reported in orchards of peach fruit [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CBC is considered one of the major threat for citriculture and it is endemic in many citrus production zones, even though, Xcc is not present in other areas such as the Mediterranean basin or California in USA, where these bacteria are regulated as quarantinable [4]. BSF is worldwide distributed with a presence in most Prunus -growing regions, however Xap is still a quarantine organism in some areas like the European Union [5,6]. CBC is defined as a tropical or subtropical disease; meanwhile, BSF occurs mostly in temperate areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%