2010
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scientific Opinion on risk assessment of parasites in fishery products

Abstract: Human fishery product‐borne parasitic diseases are caused by cestodes, trematodes and nematodes and are caused by infection following ingestion of viable parasites, or as allergic (hypersensitivity) reactions against parasite antigens. For allergy, the only parasite in fishery products implicated is the nematode Anisakis simplex, and sensitisation occurs via infection by live larvae. Once sensitised, response to nematode allergens can be highly aggressive and generate severe disease. In a sensitised individual… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
131
0
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 220 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 180 publications
(296 reference statements)
2
131
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the normal distribution of aggregating larvae was observed in chub mackerel, possibly associated with the limited life span of the parasite and the robustness of the host immune response at a specific length/age (49). We also confirmed the tendency of Anisakis larvae toward a particular organ in a specific host (2,43,44,49), which has been related to the availability of nutrients to the parasite (2), although firm evidence has never been provided. We argue that an anatomical relationship between the point of anisakid penetration through the gastrointestinal tract (related to intrinsic host factors, such as gut peristalsis or the quantity of its content) and the location of the visceral organ that is close to that point governs the predilection site in the host.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, the normal distribution of aggregating larvae was observed in chub mackerel, possibly associated with the limited life span of the parasite and the robustness of the host immune response at a specific length/age (49). We also confirmed the tendency of Anisakis larvae toward a particular organ in a specific host (2,43,44,49), which has been related to the availability of nutrients to the parasite (2), although firm evidence has never been provided. We argue that an anatomical relationship between the point of anisakid penetration through the gastrointestinal tract (related to intrinsic host factors, such as gut peristalsis or the quantity of its content) and the location of the visceral organ that is close to that point governs the predilection site in the host.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…We observed a significant difference in the numbers of parasite larvae (1 to 32) in individual hosts and between species, as described previously (2,23), which underscores the necessity to monitor anisakid infections over a longer time span in order to develop an adequate risk assessment analysis for commercially important fish. Interestingly, the aggregation of the parasite varies with the host species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Należy podkreślić, że reakcje alergiczne mogą wystąpić również w przypadku spożycia przetworzonych produktów rybnych, w których stwierdza się obecność alergenów Anisakis (2,9). Do 2010 r. na świecie zarejestrowano ponad 20 000 przypadków anisakiozy u ludzi (18). Rocznie notuje się około 2000 nowych przypadków (33).…”
Section: Artykuł Przeglądowy Reviewunclassified
“…So far, Anisakis simplex (sensu lato ), i.e. Anisakis simplex (sensu stricto), Anisakis pegreffii and Anisakis berlandi are the only fishery-product associated parasites causing clinical allergic responses recognized by EFSA [9]. In fact, A. simplex ( s.l. )…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%