Scientific papers presented at the 2000–2001 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) meetings: publication rates during the period 2000–2004

Seçil, Mustafa; Uçar, Gökhan; Dıcle, Oğuz

doi:10.1007/s00330-006-0297-z

Cited by 31 publications

(46 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Comparatively, the overall publication rate of 44.9% appears to be higher than previously shown for other international radiology conferences. For example, publication rates for the 1993 American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR) conference, the 1995 Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) conference, and the 2001 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) conference were 37%, 33% and 40%, respectively (12)(13)(14)(15). The higher rate of publication of presented abstracts at SIR and CIRSE is likely multifactorial.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The date range for manuscript search was from the 2012 conference date until approximately 3 years later (Apr 1,2015). CIRSE was held from September [15][16][17][18][19]2012, and SIR from March 24-29, 2012. The protocol for manuscript search began with PubMed, in which the first authors last name and first initial was used to identify possible articles with a similar title.…”

Section: Data Collectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Publication rates of abstracts presented at major interventional radiology conferences

Shergill

Kaka²,

Kennedy³

et al. 2017

Diagn Interv Radiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

P resentation at research conferences serves as a valuable channel for individuals to share new knowledge and advances in a given clinical field. The ultimate goal of a conference presentation is usually subsequent manuscript publication. The process of submitting a manuscript for publication typically requires extensive peer review and revisions (1). Research quality plays a major role in whether a study is accepted by a journal. Therefore, assessing the rate at which presentations at major conferences are published can serve as a surrogate marker of the quality of conference presentations.Insight into publication rate raises the question of which factors, if any, increase the likelihood of a conference abstract ultimately being published in a peer-reviewed journal. For example, past studies have demonstrated publication bias, in which studies with positive or statistically significant results are more likely to be accepted by a journal compared with those with nonsignificant results (2).The publication rate of presentations at major conferences varies depending on the specialty and conference. Publication rates for various national surgical conferences have been shown to range from 36% to 65% (3-6). Other example publication rates include 32% for emergency medicine, 35%-50% for pediatrics, and 50% for cardiology (3, 7). A previous meta-analysis reviewed the number of abstracts that went on to publication for several specialty conferences and reported publication rates that varied from 32%-67% (3). I N T E R V E N T I O N A L R A D I O LO G Y O R I G I N A L A R T I C L E PURPOSEWe aimed to determine the publication rate and factors predictive of publication of oral presentations at the annual meetings of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe (CIRSE) and the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR). METHODSKeywords and authors from oral presentation abstracts at the 2012 CIRSE and SIR annual meetings were used to search PubMed and GoogleScholar for subsequent publication. Logistic regression was performed to identify whether number of authors, country of origin, subject category, methodology, study type, and/or study results were predictive of publication. RESULTSA total of 421 abstracts (CIRSE-126, SIR-295) met the inclusion criteria. The overall publication rate across both conferences was 44.9%. Time from conference presentation to publication was 15±8.9 months for CIRSE and 16.3±8.8 months for SIR (P > 0.05), with a combined time interval of 15.9±8.8 months for both. The median impact factor of published abstracts was 2.075 (interquartile range, 2.075-2.775) for CIRSE and 2.093 (2.075-2.856) for SIR (P > 0.05). The most common country of origin for published abstracts was Germany (27.1%) at CIRSE and the United States (69%) at SIR. Logistic regression did not identify factors that were predictive of future publication. CONCLUSIONPublication rates were similar for CIRSE and SIR. Factors such as country of origin, topic of study and study results were not predictive of future pub...

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Data Collectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Publication rates of abstracts presented at major interventional radiology conferences

Shergill

Kaka²,

Kennedy³

et al. 2017

Diagn Interv Radiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Abstract presentations at national meetings allow a rapid transfer of knowledge in summarizing current research and focusing future research endeavors (1)(2)(3)(4)(5). In spite of the fact that many studies are of sufficient value for presentation in these sessions, only the most instructive and highest quality studies are worthy of full-text publication in a peer-reviewed journal (2).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In a survey of the literature, the publication rate of papers from a variety of specialties ranged between 8.5% and 78% (6). Worldwide, only a few investigations exist concerning radiology meetings, which report rates ranging 11%-47% (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8). According to a study evaluating Turkish radiology meetings in years 1995-2002, the overall publication rate was 11% (1).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The fate of abstracts presented at Turkish national radiology congresses in 2010-2012

Beker‐Acay

Fidan²,

Ünlü³

et al. 2015

Diagn Interv Radiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

R adiology meetings provide a significant channel for exchanging scientific information. Abstract presentations at national meetings allow a rapid transfer of knowledge in summarizing current research and focusing future research endeavors (1)(2)(3)(4)(5). In spite of the fact that many studies are of sufficient value for presentation in these sessions, only the most instructive and highest quality studies are worthy of full-text publication in a peer-reviewed journal (2). The rate of publication may be considered as an indicator of the scientific quality of the meeting, that is, the ratio of presented abstracts to full-text published papers in peer-reviewed journals. In a survey of the literature, the publication rate of papers from a variety of specialties ranged between 8.5% and 78% (6). Worldwide, only a few investigations exist concerning radiology meetings, which report rates ranging 11%-47% (1-8). According to a study evaluating Turkish radiology meetings in years 1995-2002, the overall publication rate was 11% (1). We aimed to investigate the subsequent publication rates in Medline-indexed journals from presentations at the Turkish Congress of Radiology between 2010 and 2012. MethodsUsing the abstract CDs from the meetings, a list of the presentations submitted to Turkish national radiology congresses between 2010 and 2012 was obtained. The publication rate in Medline-indexed journals was determined by searching the PubMed database with the aim of exploring whether the abstracts had been expanded to full-text articles by September 2014. Three of the authors (N.F., A.K., and H.U.) performed this search via PubMed® using the first author's surname and initial(s). If this failed, the same search was performed for the second author or if necessary an appropriate keyword from the title of the abstract was added to the search. To METHODSAbstracts presented in the national radiology meetings of 2010, 2011, and 2012 were included in the study. The presentations were classified according to presentation type (oral or poster presentations), study type, study design, imaged organ or body systems, imaging modalities, time interval between the presentation and the publication date, and the journal in which the article was published. The conversion rate of presentations into full-text articles in peer-reviewed journals were surveyed through PubMed. The time from presentation in the meetings to publication was determined. The distribution of journals was also demonstrated. RESULTSThe total number of presentations submitted in three national radiology meetings was 3,192. The publication rate was 11% for the 2010 meeting, 8.2% for the 2011 meeting, and 9.6% for the 2012 meeting. A total of 300 papers were published, with an average of 15 months (range, 0-42 months) between presentation and final publication. The first three refereed international journals with the most number of papers derived from these meetings were Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinical Imaging, and European Journal of Radiology. CONCLUSIO...

show abstract

“…Hence, some authors suggested that the rate of publication of orally presented scientific abstracts might constitute an interesting criterion [1]. Regarding radiology meetings, several investigations reported publication rates ranging from 8% to 47% [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of subsequent publication of scientific orally presented abstracts of the French national congress of radiology. Part I: General characteristics

Dangouloff‐Ros

Ronot

Lagadec

et al. 2015

Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Scientific papers presented at the 2000–2001 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) meetings: publication rates during the period 2000–2004

Cited by 31 publications

References 17 publications

Publication rates of abstracts presented at major interventional radiology conferences

Publication rates of abstracts presented at major interventional radiology conferences

The fate of abstracts presented at Turkish national radiology congresses in 2010-2012

Analysis of subsequent publication of scientific orally presented abstracts of the French national congress of radiology. Part I: General characteristics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About