2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scientific reasoning in elementary school children: Assessment and relations with cognitive abilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
117
1
11

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
22
117
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Most five-year-olds successfully attributed a belief revision to the protagonist when the relation presented in the data was straightforward (perfect covariation), showing that they are able to successfully interpret simple patterns of data without any distortions and to incorporate this new evidence into their theories (see also Piekny & Maehler, 2013;van der Graaf, Segers, & Verhoeven, 2016, for a replication of these findings). These confirmatory findings of early data interpretation skills are in line with a growing literature on early preschool and primary school scientific thinking, which shows that already young children possess a basic understanding of the distinction between hypothesis and evidence (Mayer, Koerber, Sodian & Schwippert, 2014;Sandoval, Sodian, Koerber, & Wong, 2014). The discovery of increasingly mature scientific thinking skills in this young age group suggests that children, in principle, should be able to use data and evidence to update and revise their initially held beliefs.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Most five-year-olds successfully attributed a belief revision to the protagonist when the relation presented in the data was straightforward (perfect covariation), showing that they are able to successfully interpret simple patterns of data without any distortions and to incorporate this new evidence into their theories (see also Piekny & Maehler, 2013;van der Graaf, Segers, & Verhoeven, 2016, for a replication of these findings). These confirmatory findings of early data interpretation skills are in line with a growing literature on early preschool and primary school scientific thinking, which shows that already young children possess a basic understanding of the distinction between hypothesis and evidence (Mayer, Koerber, Sodian & Schwippert, 2014;Sandoval, Sodian, Koerber, & Wong, 2014). The discovery of increasingly mature scientific thinking skills in this young age group suggests that children, in principle, should be able to use data and evidence to update and revise their initially held beliefs.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…It specifies that causal data inferences obtained in an experiment can only be drawn if only one variable has been manipulated at a time (Strand-Cary & Klahr, 2008;Tschirgi, 1980). Understanding the CVS is necessary to generate and test causal hypotheses; that is, to design conclusive and valid experiments and to critically evaluate the outcomes of experiments (D. Mayer, Sodian, Koerber, & Schwippert, 2014;National Research Council, 2012;Zimmerman, 2007). A first grasp of the CVS gradually emerges during childhood as a consequence of cognitive development and learning opportunities provided in school (Osterhaus, Koerber, & Sodian, 2017;Sandoval et al, 2014).…”
Section: Control-of-variables Strategy and Science Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Például a változók kontrollját és annak összefüggését a feladatok, adatok típusával (Zhou, Han, Koenig, Raplinger, Pi, Li, Xiao, Fu és Bao, 2015), a tudomány természetének ismeretét, az elméletek megértését, kísérletek tervezését, eredmények interpretálását és azok összefüggését az intelligenciával, szövegértéssel, problémamegoldással, térbeli képességekkel (Mayer, Sodian, Koerber és Schwippert, 2014). Számos tapasztalat gyűlt össze a kutatásalapú tanulás hatékonyságának értékelési lehetőségeiről is (lásd pl.…”
Section: Elméleti Háttérunclassified