2015
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scientific standards and MIAPEs in plant proteomics research and publications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, our research has been focused on studying plant responses to abiotic and biotic stresses related to decline syndrome, mainly drought and P. cinnamomi infestation, as well as differences among Q. ilex provenances from Andalusia combining proteomics, morphometry, and physiological analysis [17,20,21,22,23]. This manuscript does not intend to be a review of the field of proteomics, because there are already a high number of publications available in the literature [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32], or discuss terminology or scientific standards mandated by the corresponding Minimum Information about Proteomics Experiment (MIAPE) guidelines [33]. On the other hand, the application of proteomics in forest tree research has also been the subject of some previous reviews, with a quite descriptive point of view [34,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, our research has been focused on studying plant responses to abiotic and biotic stresses related to decline syndrome, mainly drought and P. cinnamomi infestation, as well as differences among Q. ilex provenances from Andalusia combining proteomics, morphometry, and physiological analysis [17,20,21,22,23]. This manuscript does not intend to be a review of the field of proteomics, because there are already a high number of publications available in the literature [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32], or discuss terminology or scientific standards mandated by the corresponding Minimum Information about Proteomics Experiment (MIAPE) guidelines [33]. On the other hand, the application of proteomics in forest tree research has also been the subject of some previous reviews, with a quite descriptive point of view [34,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These leaf papers can be divided by experimental conditions: nine papers on abiotic stress, 15 on biotic stress, and eight on non-challenged plants (Figure 2B). To extract the same type of information on the proteins described in the papers we faced the difficulty of the insufficient descriptions of datasets and different terminologies used by the several authors, problems already reported by Jorrin-Novo [42]. For this reason we were not able to perform a bioinformatic functional annotation of the proteins (e.g., BLAST2GO) but, instead, we did a manual inspection of the data.…”
Section: Bibliographic Search (Description Of the Paper Dataset Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Jorrin‐Novo published an opinion article in which scientific standards and MIAPE were discussed in the context of proteomics work and publications. From his experience, the failure to meet proper scientific standards and those requested for a proteomics paper is the most obvious and immediate reason for rejection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From his experience, the failure to meet proper scientific standards and those requested for a proteomics paper is the most obvious and immediate reason for rejection. As just a simple example, the general terminology employed in the literature included terms such as protein expression, when proteomics approaches actually determine abundance . Abundance is the result not only of gene expression (transcription and translation) but also of protein degradation and PTMs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%