2015
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-015-0714-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scientific workflow optimization for improved peptide and protein identification

Abstract: BackgroundPeptide-spectrum matching is a common step in most data processing workflows for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Many algorithms and software packages, both free and commercial, have been developed to address this task. However, these algorithms typically require the user to select instrument- and sample-dependent parameters, such as mass measurement error tolerances and number of missed enzymatic cleavages. In order to select the best algorithm and parameter set for a particular dataset, in-dept… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thanks to the combination of advances in instrumentation, fragmentation methods, and analysis strategies, MS has become an indispensable tool for the study of protein expression, protein interactions, and modifications. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] A typical strategy for obtaining proteomics information from a biological sample consists of the combination of enzymatic digestion (usually by trypsin) followed by (nano)-liquid chromatography electrospray ionization tandem MS of the resulting peptides. One of the fragmentation approaches is the data-dependent MS/MS analysis (DDA),…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to the combination of advances in instrumentation, fragmentation methods, and analysis strategies, MS has become an indispensable tool for the study of protein expression, protein interactions, and modifications. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] A typical strategy for obtaining proteomics information from a biological sample consists of the combination of enzymatic digestion (usually by trypsin) followed by (nano)-liquid chromatography electrospray ionization tandem MS of the resulting peptides. One of the fragmentation approaches is the data-dependent MS/MS analysis (DDA),…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SSRCalc was implemented for online access at http://hs2.proteome.ca/SSR-Calc/SSRCalcX.html with several optional versions optimized for a variety of most popular RP-HPLC separation conditions. Recently, the SSRCalc model has been upgraded by taking The SSRCalc algorithm was also integrated into a number of proteomic pipelines used for peptide identification filtering 29,45 and scheduling of the parent-fragment transitions in MRM/SRM-based quantitative analysis (Skyline, 46 ATAQS, 47 SRMCollider, 48 and MaRiMba 49 ).…”
Section: Retention Time Prediction Based On the Amino Acid Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6). This is likely due to another peptide within the isolation window that accounts for (most of) the MS2 singals 18 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%