Scientists in the Politicoscientific Community: Beyond the Lorax

Spafford, Helen

doi:10.1093/aesa/saz006

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Many scientists have opportunities to be involved in policy advocacy, depending upon the guidelines of their respective agencies and institutions [79,80]. Advocacy can include one-on-one contact (visit and/or call) with local legislatures, visiting them in Washington DC, and working through their stakeholders to reach lawmakers.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Current Status of Forest Health Policy in the United States

Gandhi

Campbell²,

Abrams

2019

Insects

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ederal policies related to forestry and forest health (specifically, insects and diseases) have the potential to affect management practices, terms of international and interstate trade, and long-term sustainability and conservation. Our objectives were to review existing federal policies, the role of federal agencies in managing forest health, and guidance for future policy efforts. Since the 1940s, various federal policies relevant to forest health have been established, and several US Department of Agriculture (USDA) agencies have been empowered to assist with prevention, quarantine, detection, management, and control of insects and diseases. Overall, our review showed that relatively few national policies directly address forest health as a stand-alone objective, as most of them are embedded within forestry bills. Federal funding for forest health issues and the number of personnel dedicated to such issues have declined dramatically for some agencies. Concomitantly, native species continue to gain pestiferous status while non-native species continue to establish and cause impacts in the US. To enhance our ability and capacity to deal with current and future threats, concerted efforts are needed to advocate for both resources and stand-alone policy tools that take seriously the complexity of emerging sustainability challenges in both private and public forestlands.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Current Status of Forest Health Policy in the United States

Gandhi

Campbell²,

Abrams

2019

Insects

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Use your power for good: Collective action to overcome institutional injustices impeding ethical science communication in the academy

Broder,

Merkle,

Balgopal

et al. 2024

BioScience

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Science communication (scicomm) shapes our world by helping people use science to make societal and personal decisions. Supporting and doing ethical scicomm requires valuing diverse perspectives and the people who do scicomm. Unfortunately, institutional hurdles ingrained in academia impede and undermine ethical scicomm. The injustices impeding scicomm stem from the prestige paradigm of academia (articulated in the present article), which reinforces hierarchical relationships in an exclusionary and exploitative system. To move academia forward, we name and review these injustices through the lens of five realms of scicomm (scientific communication, teaching scicomm, academics engaging in scicomm, scicomm research, and scicomm careers beyond academia). We then provide a novel framework, helping readers identify axes of influence and how they can leverage their intersectional, academic capital to take concrete action to remove the hurdles impeding ethical scicomm in academia.

show abstract

Scientists in the Politicoscientific Community: Beyond the Lorax

Cited by 2 publications

References 24 publications

Current Status of Forest Health Policy in the United States

Current Status of Forest Health Policy in the United States

Use your power for good: Collective action to overcome institutional injustices impeding ethical science communication in the academy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About