Scientometric Analysis of the Top 50 Most-Cited Joint Arthroplasty Papers: Traditional vs Altmetric Measures

Baghdadi, Soroush; Salimi, Maryam; Shafiei, Seyyed Hossein

doi:10.1016/j.artd.2022.03.001

Cited by 14 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 78 publications

(148 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We measured the h-index only for authors, institutions and funding organizations leading osteoarthritis research in Europe. Our approach was in line with previous studies (Chen et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2020;Mirghaderi et al, 2022). Different than previous studies (Gao et al, 2020;Muthu et al, 2022;Shu et al, 2022) however, we did not analyze coupling, co-authorship, co-occurrence and co-citations but focused only countries, authors, institutions, funding and research areas.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 70%

“…This could be also related to the inclusion of new journals, publications and expanding indexing. Journal impact factor (JIF) and first author H-index were furthermore extracted in a recent study (Mirghaderi et al, 2022). Two studies (Wang et al, 2019); Gao et al, 2020) analyzed bibliographical coupling, co-authorship, co-citation and co-occurrence.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Another study (Muthu et al, 2022) additionally included text mining and cluster network analysis. Scientometric OA articles were mostly on global output (Gupta & Gupta, 2018), non-surgical interventions (Wang et al, 2019), rehabilitation (Wang et al, 2020), pain management (Chen et al, 2021), acupuncture (Li et al, 2020), hyaluronic acid (Zhang et al, 2020), platelet-rich plasma (Ren et al, 2021;Patel et al, 2022), bone marrow aspirate concentrate (Muthu et al, 2022), stem cells (Xing et al, 2018), macrophages (Yang et al, 2022), chondrocytes and mRNA (Hu et al, 2022), arthroscopy [Li et al, 2021), high-tibial osteotomy (Zhang et al, 2020), uni-compartmental knee arthroplasty (Liu et al, 2020), primary total knee arthroplasty (Mirghaderi et al, 2022) and shoulder arthroplasty (Shu & Ou & Hu, 2022). Three studies (Wei, 2020;Vilchez-Roman et al,2021); Zhang & Blazar & Kilgallen, 2022) focused on the social dimension of scientific activities and academic impact of OA articles.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Multi-Disciplinary Approach and Collaborative Studies Increase the Impact of Osteoarthritis Publications: A European Perspective

Koçak,

Nürnberger,

Aulin

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Scientometric analysis of osteoarthritis (OA) publication was randomly undertaken during the last five years. A multi-disciplinary and collaborative scientometric study was designed and conducted. We analyzed publication and citation trends of OA articles between 2007 and 2021 in the Clarivate-Web of Science and InCites databases for the European Union (EU), the non-EU associated and the geographically European (Geo-EU) countries. We furthermore evaluated citations, Citation Impact (CI), Category Normalized Citation Impact (CNCI) and the Impact Relative to World (IREW) distributions. Leading countries, authors, institutions and funding agencies were defined. The impact of multi-disciplinary and collaborative studies was determined. Publication and citation numbers on OA research increased from 2007 to 2021. European citations, CI, CNCI and IREW distributions were higher than that of the World baseline. The United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Germany preceded OA research in Europe. UDICE-French Research Universities, University of Oxford and Assistance Publique Hopitaux Paris were leading European institutions. Funding was mostly from non-European resources. European countries with a higher gross national income quantitatively dominated the outcome and impact of OA research. We found that multi-disciplinary and collaborative studies were mostly published in higher journal quartiles. We conclude that collaboration and multi disciplinarity increases the impact in OA research. Methodology of quantifying impact could be applied to other research areas in the future.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 70%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Multi-Disciplinary Approach and Collaborative Studies Increase the Impact of Osteoarthritis Publications: A European Perspective

Koçak,

Nürnberger,

Aulin

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, access to elective healthcare has been adversely affected, especially orthopedic surgical procedures such as joint replacements ( 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ). A COVID-19 pandemic-related surgical delay exacerbated osteoarthritis (OA), caused discomfort, and lowered quality of life in severe OA patients ( 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ). It is possible for surgical patients to acquire COVID-19 infections despite low rates of COVID-19 infection in the area ( 14 , 15 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

COVID-19 Infection Risk Following Elective Arthroplasty and Surgical Complications in COVID-19-vaccinated Patients: A Multicenter Comparative Cohort Study

Salimi¹,

Moharrami²,

Dolama³

et al. 2022

Arthroplasty Today

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In a plain AP radiograph, if the anterior rim of the acetabulum intersects the posterior rim below the upper margin of the acetabulum, it is called a crossover sign (COS). Evaluation of femoral head coverage and acetabular orientation contributes to preoperative planning and decision-making of reorientation procedures [ 8 ]. Posterior and anterior femoral head coverage on an anteroposterior (AP) hip radiograph can be assessed by tracing the posterior and anterior rim contours.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Crossover Sign in Pelvis Models Made with a Three-Dimensional Printer

Salimi

Gholamzadeh

Qahremani

et al. 2022

Advances in Orthopedics

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction. Investigation of the crossover sign (COS) in different degrees of tilt in pelvises made by three-dimensional printing of CT scans among patients with normal hip versions was carried out. Methods. Radiology CT scans of 8 normal pelvises reconstructed in 3D and the effect of sequential tilting on the presence of the false-positive COS in 48 radiographs were investigated. Results. The COS was seen in 77% of the AP radiographs during tilt changes. The average distance between the tip of the coccyx and the symphysis pubis was 32.06 ± 10.99 mm. Also, COSs were present in all radiographs from 6 degrees tilt and above. Conclusion. Minor tilting of the pelvis can result in a false-positive crossover sign on AP plain radiographs.

show abstract

Scientometric Analysis of the Top 50 Most-Cited Joint Arthroplasty Papers: Traditional vs Altmetric Measures

Cited by 14 publications

References 78 publications

Multi-Disciplinary Approach and Collaborative Studies Increase the Impact of Osteoarthritis Publications: A European Perspective

Multi-Disciplinary Approach and Collaborative Studies Increase the Impact of Osteoarthritis Publications: A European Perspective

COVID-19 Infection Risk Following Elective Arthroplasty and Surgical Complications in COVID-19-vaccinated Patients: A Multicenter Comparative Cohort Study

Evaluation of Crossover Sign in Pelvis Models Made with a Three-Dimensional Printer

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About