2014
DOI: 10.14429/djlit.34.4893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scientometric Assessment of Publication Productivity of JNTBGRI, Thiruvananthapuram

Abstract: The article explores the scientometric assessment of publication productivity of Jawaharlal Nehru Tropical Botanic Garden and Research Institute (JNTBGRI). The data for the study was taken from the Annual report of the JNTBGRI from 2001-2010 which were then tabulated and analysed. The scientists of JNTBGRI prefer mostly Indian journals to publish their articles. Journal of Economic Taxonomic Botany tops the list with the highest number of articles 50 (9.11 %), followed by Zoos (Print Journal) with 39 articles.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MCC in the field of Natural Science in the case of the university, Jamia Milia Islamia was found to be varied from 0.32 to 1.00 as reported by Kumar and Naqvi (2014). Mini Devi and Lekshmi (2014) derived the MCC for Jawaharlal Nehru Tropical Botanic Garden and Research Institute (JNTBGRI), Thiruvananthapuram in the range 0.482-0.807.…”
Section: Use Of Metrics-(dc) (Ci) (Cc) (Mcc) and (Cai)mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The MCC in the field of Natural Science in the case of the university, Jamia Milia Islamia was found to be varied from 0.32 to 1.00 as reported by Kumar and Naqvi (2014). Mini Devi and Lekshmi (2014) derived the MCC for Jawaharlal Nehru Tropical Botanic Garden and Research Institute (JNTBGRI), Thiruvananthapuram in the range 0.482-0.807.…”
Section: Use Of Metrics-(dc) (Ci) (Cc) (Mcc) and (Cai)mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Other collaborative measures are Degree of Collaboration (DC), Collaborative Index (CI), Collaborative Coefficient (CC), Modified Collaborative Coefficient (MCC), and Co-authorship Index (CAI) which were used for analyzing the extent of collaboration among authors. The papers deal with these measures were studied by Aswathy and Gopikuttan (2015), Bharti and Meera (2017), Chaurasia and Chavan (2014), Das and Maharana (2016), Mini Devi and Lekshmi (2014), Gautam and Mishra (2015), Gopikuttan and Aswathy (2016), Kumar et al (2015), Khan and Ahangar (2015), Koganuramah et al (2002), Kumar and Dora (2012), Kumar and Naqvi (2014), Meera and Sahu (2014), Nandi and Kumar (2013), Nandi and Mondal (2017), Peter et al (2019), Satpathy and Sa (2015), Sharma (2009), Varghese and Rajan (2009), and Vijay et al (2019). The mean DC for the Botany Department; at the University of Burdwan is 0.70 as examined by Nandi and Kumar (2013).…”
Section: Use Of Metrics—(dc) (Ci) (Cc) (Mcc) and (Cai)mentioning
confidence: 99%