1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf01658982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scintigraphic detection of gastric and pancreatic carcinomas with In‐111 ZCE 025 monoclonal antibody

Abstract: We have evaluated the role of In-111 anti-CEA (carcinoembryonic antigen) monoclonal antibody ZCE 025 in 8 patients. Three patients had a confirmed diagnosis of gastric carcinoma. Three had a confirmed diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma. Two patients had elevated serum levels of CEA with no known primary. Each patient received 5.5 mCi In-111 ZCE 025 infused at doses of 10-80 mg. Planar and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging at 3 and 7 days after infusion detected 9 of 12 known tumor sites… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although RAIDs have been successfully applied to several kinds of malignant tumors in organs such as colon, [2][3][4] lung, 12) and others, 13) there have been few studies on pancreatic cancer. 14,15) 111 In usually accumulates nonspecifically in the reticuloendothelial system, such as liver, spleen and bone marrow. DTPA is usually excreted from kidney.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although RAIDs have been successfully applied to several kinds of malignant tumors in organs such as colon, [2][3][4] lung, 12) and others, 13) there have been few studies on pancreatic cancer. 14,15) 111 In usually accumulates nonspecifically in the reticuloendothelial system, such as liver, spleen and bone marrow. DTPA is usually excreted from kidney.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, 111 In-labeled ZCE-025 (an anti-CEA mAb that does not react with normal granulocyte glycoproteins) was investigated in several studies for the detection of primary, metastatic, or recurrent colorectal carcinomas (Abdel-Nabi et al 1988; Abdel-Nabi et al 1991; Kramer et al 1988; Patt et al 1988; Patt et al 1990). Imaging in patients with rising CEA levels successfully detected metastatic colorectal cancer that could not be detected by other methods, therefore changing patient management in many cases.…”
Section: Spect and Gamma Camera Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%