2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-006-0399-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment study (SPR Study): recruitment list evaluation. Study report no. 2

Abstract: In the recruitment lists of the SPR Study of the year 2000, RRD of medium severity was present in nearly one third of the patients with primary RRD. These findings emphasise the clinical relevance of the SPR Study.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
1
11

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
24
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…This includes the number of breaks, the extent of the retinal detachment, the presence of PVR before surgery, the involvement of the macular region, the height of the retinal detachment (bullous or not), refractive errors , the lens status and others. The effect of these factors on the functional and anatomic outcome of retinal detachment surgery has been previously investigated in the ‘Scleral Buckling versus Primary Vitrectomy in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment (SPR)’ trials [9,10,11], which were designed to compare SB surgery and primary pars plana vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachments of medium complexity. The categories of severity described in our study are based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the SPR trail [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes the number of breaks, the extent of the retinal detachment, the presence of PVR before surgery, the involvement of the macular region, the height of the retinal detachment (bullous or not), refractive errors , the lens status and others. The effect of these factors on the functional and anatomic outcome of retinal detachment surgery has been previously investigated in the ‘Scleral Buckling versus Primary Vitrectomy in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment (SPR)’ trials [9,10,11], which were designed to compare SB surgery and primary pars plana vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachments of medium complexity. The categories of severity described in our study are based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the SPR trail [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] In patients with complex RRD, however, pars plan vitrectomy with or without scleral buckling surgery has been associated with significantly higher success rate compared with scleral buckling alone. 6 Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is a wound healing process characterized by migration and proliferation of resident ocular cells including retinal pigment epithelial cells and invading immune cells leading to formation of adherent membranes over and under the retina. These membranes are able to contract and cause recurrent retinal detachment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41,42 In this study buckling consisted in most cases in a cerclage with or without an additional buckle and with drainage of subretinal fluid. In phakic eyes the functional results were statistically significant better after scleral buckling than after primary vitrectomy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%