lead to catastrophic sepsis and require re-exploration, with the potential for extended bowel resection, irreversible stomas, short-gut syndrome, and occasionally, death. We are currently considering a systematic second look 24 hours after the primary procedure. Particular attention should be paid to the terminal ileum, where, in our experience, unnoticed injuries are more likely to occur.The technique we describe here entails a less aggressive approach, which may be better suited to renal patients who frequently have comorbidities and who may be receiving immunosuppressant therapy. Breaking the capsule and releasing the small bowel by gentle pressure is feasible and less time-consuming than total enterolysis and peritonectomy-a surgical technique that is usually associated with significant blood loss and a need for transfusion.Renal patients who are seriously compromised with long-term bowel obstruction and total parenteral nutrition are at much higher risk of developing postoperative complications with poorer long-term outcomes. We would therefore propose early surgical management in this patient group.
CONCLUSIONSThe less-aggressive surgical approach of PCC to treat severe forms of EPS has, in our limited experience, attained reasonable long-term clinical results. Those results have encouraged treatment of patients at an early symptomatic stage, with the inclusion of a "second look" policy in future patients. Larger studies are needed to evaluate the proposed technique in a wider population affected by EPS.
DISCLOSURESThe authors declare that no potential or actual personal, financial, or political interests are associated with this submission. REFERENCES 1. Garosi G, Di Paolo N, Sacchi G, Gaggiotti E. Sclerosing peritonitis: a nosological entity. Perit Dial Int 2005; 25(Suppl 3):S110-12. 2. Dobbie JW. Pathogenesis of peritoneal fibrosing syndromes (sclerosing peritonitis) in peritoneal dialysis.