Scope and nature of prescribing decisions made by general practitioners

Abstract

Background: This study describes cognitive processes of doctors who are deciding on the treatment for a patient. This helps to uncover how prescribing decisions could benefit from (computerised) support. Methods: While thinking aloud, 61 general practitioners made prescribing decisions for five patients with urinary tract infections or stomach complaints. The resulting 305 transcripts were analysed to determine the scope and nature of the decision processes. Differences in the process were related to case or doctor characteristics, and to differences in the quality of prescribing behaviour. Results: The decision processes were not extensive, particularly for patients with a urinary tract infection. The doctors did not actively consider all possible relevant information. Considerations referring to core aspects of the treatment were made in 159 cases (52%) and to contextual aspects in 111 cases (36%). Habitual behaviour, defined as making a treatment decision without any specific contemplation, was observed in 118 cases (40%) and resulted in prescribing first choice as well as second choice drugs. For stomach complaints, second choice drugs were often prescribed after considering other treatments or in view of specific circumstances. Experience of the doctor was not related to the type of decision process. Conclusions: The processes observed deviate from the decision theoretic norm of thoroughly evaluating all possible options, but these deviations do not always result in suboptimal prescribing. Decision support is useful for bringing pertinent information and first choice treatments to the prescriber's attention. In particular, information about relevant contraindications, interactions, and costs could improve the quality of prescribing.

Evaluating the clinical appropriateness of nurses' prescribing practice: method development and findings from an expert panel analysis

“…A review of related research undertaken as part of the study reported here also highlighted that in most of the small number of studies9 15 – 17 attempts to rate clinical appropriateness of prescribing had been undertaken through application to episodes of prescribing recorded in medical records. One other study18 used transcripts of doctors who had been asked to verbalise their prescribing decisions based on specially designed patient vignettes. The use of scenarios and records has been criticised for being divorced from actual encounters 14.…”

Limited effect of patient and disease characteristics on compliance with hospital antimicrobial guidelines

“…Routine decision-making by physicians may play a role here. Such routine-like prescribing behaviour has been reported in primary care [38] and was mentioned by physicians in an earlier study [27]. In the Netherlands, use of co-trimoxazole for treating male patients with lower UTIs, as recommended by the guideline, is quite acceptable [39].…”

Naturalistic Decision Making and Organizations: Reviewing Pragmatic Science

“…For example, in the study of GP"s prescribing decisions by Denig et al (2002), up to 10% of prescribing decisions were independently judged as inappropriate for the patient.…”

“…Such cues are implicitly or intuitively acknowledged as important or otherwise (and may not be the cues formally documented to be the most important). Denig, Witteman, and Schouten (2002) report on a study looking at the cognitive processes of general practitioners (GP"s) when making prescribing decisions. In general, GP"s did not actively consider all possible relevant information and 40% of decision instances could be described as "habitual" (i.e.…”