2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scope insensitivity in contingent valuation of complex environmental amenities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
72
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
72
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Sometimes a statistically significant effect is found between individual or household income and WTP (e.g. Bergstrom et al1985;Brouwer and Bateman, 2001;Macmillan et al2001;Veisten et al 2004), whilst sometimes no significant effect is found (Macmillan et al2001;White et al1997). Accordingly, in this study we investigate both the effects of wealth in society, measured by GDP per capita, and household (or personal) income on WTP for biodiversity and habitat conservation.…”
Section: Determinants Of the Demand For Environmental Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes a statistically significant effect is found between individual or household income and WTP (e.g. Bergstrom et al1985;Brouwer and Bateman, 2001;Macmillan et al2001;Veisten et al 2004), whilst sometimes no significant effect is found (Macmillan et al2001;White et al1997). Accordingly, in this study we investigate both the effects of wealth in society, measured by GDP per capita, and household (or personal) income on WTP for biodiversity and habitat conservation.…”
Section: Determinants Of the Demand For Environmental Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with Veisten et al (2004), unemployed people are found to have lower preferences for environmental protection. Finally, marital status might influence environmental attitudes as well.…”
Section: The Results Obtained Using the Variable Index Environmentalmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Wellinformed citizens are more aware of environmental issues and problems and have stronger environmental attitudes, because they are more knowledgeable about the possible damage (Danielson et al, 1995;Torgler and Garcia-Valiñas, 2007). The strength of formal and informal education is also visible in Tables 1 and 2 The economic situation of an individual is also a significant aspect (Whitehead, 1991;Stevens et al, 1994;Blomquist and Whitehead, 1998;Popp, 2001;Witzke and Urfei, 2001;Bulte et al, 2005;Dupont, 2004;Veisten et al, 2004;Hidano et al, 2005). These studies show a positive relationship between income and a preference to contribute to environmental causes.…”
Section: The Results Obtained Using the Variable Index Environmentalmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, there are several factors such as age, gender, educational status, income and other socio-economic factors for example, see [1] that affect citizens' environmental attitudes. Other factors, which have been included in previous studies, are related to politics or active participation in environmental organizations or the rural/urban character of the place where a household is located, in references [2][3] Working from another standpoint, sociologists and psychologists have developed various theoretical approaches, such as the Theory of Planned Behaviour in [4] and the Value-Belief Norm Theory in [5], to explain how environmental attitudes affect citizens' behaviours. Thus, most research has evaluated the environmental attitudes of individuals towards political participation in different plans of action; environmental conservation and willingness to pay for the use and conservation of different natural landscapes, see [6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%