2017
DOI: 10.5334/gjgl.106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scope-taking strategies and the order of clausal categories in German Sign Language

Abstract: The scope order of clausal categories has been claimed to be universal. In this paper we adopt a universalist cartographic approach to clausal syntax. By discussing the categories of speech acts, evaluation, epistemic modality, scalarity, volition and deontic, as well as other kinds of modality, we illustrate a striking regularity in strategies of scope-taking in German Sign Language (DGS): the wider/higher the scope of a clausal operator, the more likely its expression will occur with a high body part by way … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(39 reference statements)
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The "extra" spatial dimensions of sign languages allow for a degree of simultaneity not possible with spoken language. Indeed, a number of descriptions of sign language grammars emphasize that sign language structures are organized more simultaneously compared to spoken languages, which are structured more serially (e.g., Bross & Hole, 2017;Wilbur, 2000). In particular, in sign languages different pieces of information can be provided in parallel using the non-manual and manual channels for sign production, which both perform important grammatical functions and are generally independent from each other, despite temporal alignments at the prosodic level (for the sign level, see Wilbur, 2015; for the sentence level, Wilbur, 2018).…”
Section: Simultaneity and Sequentiality In Sign Languagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "extra" spatial dimensions of sign languages allow for a degree of simultaneity not possible with spoken language. Indeed, a number of descriptions of sign language grammars emphasize that sign language structures are organized more simultaneously compared to spoken languages, which are structured more serially (e.g., Bross & Hole, 2017;Wilbur, 2000). In particular, in sign languages different pieces of information can be provided in parallel using the non-manual and manual channels for sign production, which both perform important grammatical functions and are generally independent from each other, despite temporal alignments at the prosodic level (for the sign level, see Wilbur, 2015; for the sentence level, Wilbur, 2018).…”
Section: Simultaneity and Sequentiality In Sign Languagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their study on German Sign Language (DGS), Bross and Hole (2017) focus, in the spirit of Cinque (1999), on the possible universal ordering of syntactic categories on the clausal spine. They claim that there is a general split between the expression of categories above and below tense in DGS.…”
Section: Hypotheses: Bross and Hole (2017) On German Sign Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further descending the clausal spine and crossing tense, the lower categories, volition, deontic and root modality, find manual expression. Bross and Hole (2017) claim that the different syntactic heights of each of these three lower categories find overt realization in DGS through different concatenation strategies: While volitional verbs like PLAN or WISH systematically occur to the left of the vP in DGS (they 'concatenate from left to right' in their terminology), the position of deontic modals seems to vary (pre-or post-verbal), and root modals naturally occur in a position following the vP (i. e., root modals are expressed by a right-to-left concatenation strategy). Taken together, DGS presents the following pattern (tense added for orientation) (5).…”
Section: Hypotheses: Bross and Hole (2017) On German Sign Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations