Scoping review of community health participatory research projects in Ghana

Abstract

Background Community health participation is an essential tool in health research and management where community members, researchers and other relevant stakeholders contribute to the decision-making processes. Though community participation processes can be complex and challenging, evidence from previous studies have reported significant value of engaging with community in community health projects. Objective To identify the nature and extent of community involvement in community health participatory research (CHPR) projects in Ghana and draw lessons for participatory design of a new project on diabetes intervention in Accra called the Contextual Awareness Response and Evaluation (CARE) diabetes project. Methods A scoping review of relevant publications on CHPR projects in Ghana which had a participatory component was undertaken. PubMed, PsycINFO, African Journal Online, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, Humanities International Complete and Google Scholar were searched for articles published between January 1950 and October 2021. Levac et al.’s (2010) methodological framework for scoping reviews was used to select, collate and characterise the data. Results Fifteen studies were included in this review of CHPR projects from multiple disciplines. Participants included community health workers, patients, caregivers, policymakers, community groups, service users and providers. Based on Pretty’s participation typology, several themes were identified in relation to the involvement of participants in the identified studies. The highest levels of participation were found in two studies in the diagnosis, four in the development, five in the implementation and three in the evaluation phases of projects. Community participation across all studies was assessed as low overall. Conclusion This review showed that community participation is essential in the acceptability and feasibility of research projects in Ghana and highlighted community participation’s role in the diagnosis, development, implementation and evaluation stages of projects. Lessons from this review will be considered in the development, implementation, and future evaluation of the CARE diabetes project.

Involving hard-to-reach populations is pivotal for the tailoring and implementation of an epidemiological study in cross-border communities of French Guiana and Suriname

“…Second, it is necessary to continue our efforts to go further in involving local communities in health interventions to ultimately improve health outcomes ( 34 ). In particular, for the epidemiological studies needed to establish appropriate and evaluable health studies and interventions, we need to improve the level of community participation and progress toward interactive participation ( 33 ). This requires the promotion of intercultural dialog between Western and Traditional communities, through study co-design and evaluation and the establishment of a sustainable climate of trust and partnership ( 35 ).…”

Relationship Building between International Healthcare Volunteers and Local Healthcare Providers in Ethiopia: Real-Life Experiences in Low-Income Country

“…However, in such a situation, if they accept the lifestyle and rules of local healthcare providers, international healthcare volunteers may feel that it can be easier to adapt to the local situation. Previous studies showed that international healthcare volunteers first need to understand and accept local culture to play health-related roles [ 27 ]. Thus, accepting local cultural norms is essential to continuing outreach programs in low-income countries [ 28 ].…”

Research Buddy partnership in a MD–PhD program: lessons learned

“…The Research Buddy program reflected upon in this piece took the approach of broadening the perspective of the research team by including the voice a patient with lived experience of a health condition [ 43 ]. This is distinct from an approach which would seek to achieve representativeness from one patient partner on behalf of all patients with a shared lived experience, which would be unrealistic [ 31 , 44 ].…”

“…Early involvement has been demonstrated or recommended numerous times in a diverse range of contexts and for different levels of involvement [ 5 , 7 , 15 , 28 , 35 , 43 , 75 ].…”