2015
DOI: 10.1109/thms.2015.2438005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Score-Level Fusion of Face and Voice Using Particle Swarm Optimization and Belief Functions

Abstract: We propose an efficient particle swarm optimization (PSO) technique that weights the belief assignments of voice and face classifiers. The belief assignment is computed from the score of each modality using Denoeux and Appriou models. The fusion of the weighted belief assignments is then performed by using Dempster-Shafer (DS) theory and proportional conflict redistribution (PCR5) combination rules. Experiments are conducted on the scores of XM2VTS and BANCA multimodal databases. A comparative study is achieve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Raghavendra et al [11] proposed a PSO based fusion of near infrared and visible image for improved face verification, in the first scheme PSO is used to calculate the optimum weight of a weighted linear combination of the coefficients and in the 2 nd scheme PSO is used to select the optimal fused feature of near infrared and visible image. L. Mezai and F.Hachouf [6] proposed a fusion of face and voice using PSO and belief function at score level fusion, in which the belief assignment is generated from the score of each modality using Denoeux and Appriou models.PSO is used to estimates the confidence factor, the fusion of weighted belief assignment is carried out using Dempster-Shafer(DS) and finally make decision making whether the claim user is genuine or not. Kumar et al [12] proposed an adaptive combination of multiple biometrics classifier based on evolutionary approach in which the hybrid PSO model is used to obtain the different fusion parameter and optimal fusion strategy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Raghavendra et al [11] proposed a PSO based fusion of near infrared and visible image for improved face verification, in the first scheme PSO is used to calculate the optimum weight of a weighted linear combination of the coefficients and in the 2 nd scheme PSO is used to select the optimal fused feature of near infrared and visible image. L. Mezai and F.Hachouf [6] proposed a fusion of face and voice using PSO and belief function at score level fusion, in which the belief assignment is generated from the score of each modality using Denoeux and Appriou models.PSO is used to estimates the confidence factor, the fusion of weighted belief assignment is carried out using Dempster-Shafer(DS) and finally make decision making whether the claim user is genuine or not. Kumar et al [12] proposed an adaptive combination of multiple biometrics classifier based on evolutionary approach in which the hybrid PSO model is used to obtain the different fusion parameter and optimal fusion strategy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we use score level fusion for two modalities so each ant can be represented by "N+1" dimensions where N denotes the total number of modality which is 2 in this case and the last dimension is for fusion rule chosen from Eqs (3)- (6). Each ant can be represented by , where first two parameters are the weights assigned and last parameter is the fusion rule.…”
Section: Aco For Proposed Bimodalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Though the methods proposed in [6,36] shows a significant performance improvement, they are too complex for real-world implications. Besides feature level, there have been various methods [22,15,18,9,25] incorporating score fusion in recent years. Mezai et al [22] applied score fusion over face and voice biometric using DS theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the signatures' acquisition method, signature verification systems can be categorized into biometric applications [24], [36][37][38][39], where conflicting results are the common scenario. Although combining multiple classifiers is a widely used technique in the field of signature verification, to the best of the authors' knowledge, the degree of uncertainty that this technique may introduce to the classification problem has not been significantly explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%