2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2010.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scoring rules and survey density forecasts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather than assigning an arbitrary log score (Boero, Smith, and Wallis ), therefore, we employ instead the CRPS—a quadratic scoring method that calculates the divergence of each forecasted density from an “ideal forecast” that places all probability mass at the realized price. An important advantage of the CRPS is that, unlike the log score, it awards forecasts that place more probability near (but not at) the realized value (Gneiting and Raftery ).…”
Section: Enhancing Usda Price Forecastsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than assigning an arbitrary log score (Boero, Smith, and Wallis ), therefore, we employ instead the CRPS—a quadratic scoring method that calculates the divergence of each forecasted density from an “ideal forecast” that places all probability mass at the realized price. An important advantage of the CRPS is that, unlike the log score, it awards forecasts that place more probability near (but not at) the realized value (Gneiting and Raftery ).…”
Section: Enhancing Usda Price Forecastsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The table shows the so-called Brier score (QPS) and the ranked probability score (RPS). Following Boero et al (2009), these measures can be explained as follows. The Brier score is calculated as: where p kt is a probability forecast of the outcome k (no change of the interest rate, an increase, or a decrease of the interest rate) at time t, while d kt , k = 1,…,K, takes the value 1 if the outcome x t is k, while otherwise d kt = 0.…”
Section: Estimation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) delivers the best forecasting performance among six different forecasting regression models according to the pseudo-R 2 criterion, and the quadratic and ranked probability scoring rules (see Boero et al, 2011). 11 Gurkaynak et al (2007) find that among a variety of financial market instruments (term federal funds loans, federal funds futures, term eurodollar deposits, eurodollar futures, Treasury bills and commercial papers) the federal funds futures dominate all the other securities in forecasting U.S. monetary policy at horizons out to 6 months.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Identification Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%