2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scoring system for monitoring oral lichenoid lesions: A preliminary study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
102
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
102
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Oral mucosal changes were evaluated with a scale developed for scoring oral mucositis lesions and oral lichen planus – a condition clinically very similar to oral cGVHD (14). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oral mucosal changes were evaluated with a scale developed for scoring oral mucositis lesions and oral lichen planus – a condition clinically very similar to oral cGVHD (14). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was scored from 0 to 10 purely based on patient's response (Score 0: no oral discomfort; Score 10: extreme oral discomfort). On each appointment, clinical examination was performed to record the severity of the individual lesion by using Piboonniyom REU [13] (Reticular, Erythematous and Ulceration) severity score, which is based on the presence of reticular, atrophic, erosive/ulcerative areas of the lesion(s). Individual lesion was scored as follows (Table 1): Maximum size of the lesion was the distance between two opposite largest outside edges of the lesion.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To better present the clinical forms of OLP, RAE (reticular, atrophic and erosive lesion) scoring system was used in this study to measure the severity of OLP in its different clinical forms. It was an improvement of REU (reticular, erosive and ulcerative lesion) scoring system, and more practical [16]. Surface areas of atrophy and erosion were measured with a sterile flexible periodontal scale probe, and were estimated in squared millimetres.…”
Section: Clinical Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%