1997
DOI: 10.21236/ada339243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scoring System Improvements to Three Leadership Predictors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Consequences Test assesses divergent thinking skills and provides a standardized measure of creative cognitive ability in terms of ideational fluency and originality. Responses were scored according to the revised scoring scheme proposed by Dela Rosa, Knapp, Katz, and Payne (1997), in which each response was scored as obvious , remote , duplicate , or irrelevant/unratable . Two distinct scores for ideational fluency and originality were obtained by taking the sum of the obvious responses and remote responses, respectively.…”
Section: Study 1: Novice Officer Sample
Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Consequences Test assesses divergent thinking skills and provides a standardized measure of creative cognitive ability in terms of ideational fluency and originality. Responses were scored according to the revised scoring scheme proposed by Dela Rosa, Knapp, Katz, and Payne (1997), in which each response was scored as obvious , remote , duplicate , or irrelevant/unratable . Two distinct scores for ideational fluency and originality were obtained by taking the sum of the obvious responses and remote responses, respectively.…”
Section: Study 1: Novice Officer Sample
Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%