2016
DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2016.08.20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scoring systems for chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: if you fail to prepare you are preparing to fail

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The J-CTO, CL, CASTLE, and 20 all include lesion length of < or ≥ 20 mm as part of the score and have all been shown to predict final wiring or procedural success. [21][22][23][24] However, the performance of these scoring systems in predicting longer-term outcomes after CTO PCI is less robust and data specifically evaluating the relationship between lesion length and clinical outcomes after successful CTO PCI limited. 25 Moreover, CTO lesion length can be difficult to accurately determine and does not reflect the true extent of obstructive vessel disease proximal and distal to the occlusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The J-CTO, CL, CASTLE, and 20 all include lesion length of < or ≥ 20 mm as part of the score and have all been shown to predict final wiring or procedural success. [21][22][23][24] However, the performance of these scoring systems in predicting longer-term outcomes after CTO PCI is less robust and data specifically evaluating the relationship between lesion length and clinical outcomes after successful CTO PCI limited. 25 Moreover, CTO lesion length can be difficult to accurately determine and does not reflect the true extent of obstructive vessel disease proximal and distal to the occlusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of CTO lesion length on procedural complexity and success has been repeatedly demonstrated. The J‐CTO, CL, CASTLE, and 20 all include lesion length of < or ≥ 20 mm as part of the score and have all been shown to predict final wiring or procedural success 21–24 . However, the performance of these scoring systems in predicting longer‐term outcomes after CTO PCI is less robust and data specifically evaluating the relationship between lesion length and clinical outcomes after successful CTO PCI limited 25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently several different angiographic scoring systems assessing predictors of failure and success in CTO PCI are available, but none of them has ever included the duration of CTO in their analysis [2426]. On the other hand, CTO duration as predictor of revascularization failure has been described in computed tomography studies [13, 14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Las escalas de puntuación se consideran de gran utilidad por varios motivos: a) cuantifican la probabilidad de éxito y de complicaciones; b) permiten optimizar la selección de casos; c) ayudan a revisar y planificar la forma de abordaje de la OTC; y d) contribuyen a estandarizar la complejidad de las lesiones y poder comparar resultados 30 .…”
Section: Escalas De Puntuación En El Intervencionismo De La Otcunclassified