2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scoring the therapeutic effects of oral propranolol for infantile hemangioma: A prospective study comparing the Hemangioma Activity Score (HAS) with the Hemangioma Severity Scale (HSS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The HSS assigns higher scores to previously established high‐risk characteristics such as size, location, association with other structural anomalies, hemangioma complications (including visual compromise and ulceration), pain, and likelihood of permanent disfigurement . Janmohamed et al recently described a scoring system, the Hemangioma Activity Score (HAS), to measure proliferative activity based on the color of the IH, and the HAS has recently been shown to have advantages over the HSS in measuring longitudinal response to therapy , but the instrument design places an emphasis on activity rather than severity. In many cases, the two scoring systems correlate, but there are some situations in which a highly proliferative hemangioma may not be severe enough to warrant therapy, such as a small active lesion on the trunk, and the HAS does not account for severity associated with potential syndromic associations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HSS assigns higher scores to previously established high‐risk characteristics such as size, location, association with other structural anomalies, hemangioma complications (including visual compromise and ulceration), pain, and likelihood of permanent disfigurement . Janmohamed et al recently described a scoring system, the Hemangioma Activity Score (HAS), to measure proliferative activity based on the color of the IH, and the HAS has recently been shown to have advantages over the HSS in measuring longitudinal response to therapy , but the instrument design places an emphasis on activity rather than severity. In many cases, the two scoring systems correlate, but there are some situations in which a highly proliferative hemangioma may not be severe enough to warrant therapy, such as a small active lesion on the trunk, and the HAS does not account for severity associated with potential syndromic associations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, QOL should be the important measurement to resolve the challenges and to evaluate the efficacy of treatment. Although several scoring systems for IH have been described over the years, there have been few studies describing QOL in IH patients and their parents [ 21 , 22 ]. In addition, only a few common instruments, like the PedsQL™, could be used to assess the QOL in IH patients before IH-QOL developed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each of the standard and higher dosage groups, patient demographics (Table 1), IH clinical features (Table 2), dermatologic care, referral characteristics, and treatment specifics (Table 3) for both prospective use and retrospective use from photographs (Table 4). 11,12…”
Section: Materials S and Me Thodsmentioning
confidence: 99%