2017
DOI: 10.18590/euscorpius.2017.vol2017.iss253.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scorpions of the Horn of Africa (Arachnida: Scorpiones). Part XII. Pandinurus hangarale sp. n. (Scorpionidae) from Somaliland and a review of type locality and true distribution of Pandinurus smithi (Pocock, 1897)

Abstract: EDITOR: Victor Fet, Marshall University, 'fet@marshall.edu' ASSOCIATE EDITOR: Michael E. Soleglad, 'soleglad@znet.com' Euscorpius is the first research publication completely devoted to scorpions (Arachnida: Scorpiones). Euscorpius takes advantage of the rapidly evolving medium of quick online publication, at the same time maintaining high research standards for the burgeoning field of scorpion science (scorpiology). Euscorpius is an expedient and viable medium for the publication of serious papers in scorp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…INCLUDED TAXA: As redefined in the present contribution, Pandininae includes 44 species in seven genera (Prendini, 2001a(Prendini, , 2016Kovarik et al, , 2017cKovarik et al, , 2019b: Pandiborellius Rossi, 2015;Pandinoides Fet, 1997;Pandinops three points for P viatoris south of the Zambezi River, one in the extreme north of Zimbabwe (presumably, the specimen erroneously labelled "Mashonaland" [ZMB 35310]) and two in Mozambique, corresponding to the approximate locations of Tete and Beira, where this species does not appear to occur based on surveys by the first author, Rossi (201L5a: 20,21,29) discussed the reliability of Kovarik's (2012) Zimbabwean record, but apparently missed the point about the Zambezi River, as he did not mention the other two localities, and went on to describe Pandinurus (P.) prendinii Rossi, 2015, from a single female, allegedly from Messina in the Limpopo Province of South Africa. Prendini (2016: 57) synonymized P prendinii with Pandinurus (P) sudanicus (Hirst, 1911) on the grounds that the meristic data listed as diagnostic for P prendinii fall entirely within the ranges given for P sudanicus.…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…INCLUDED TAXA: As redefined in the present contribution, Pandininae includes 44 species in seven genera (Prendini, 2001a(Prendini, , 2016Kovarik et al, , 2017cKovarik et al, , 2019b: Pandiborellius Rossi, 2015;Pandinoides Fet, 1997;Pandinops three points for P viatoris south of the Zambezi River, one in the extreme north of Zimbabwe (presumably, the specimen erroneously labelled "Mashonaland" [ZMB 35310]) and two in Mozambique, corresponding to the approximate locations of Tete and Beira, where this species does not appear to occur based on surveys by the first author, Rossi (201L5a: 20,21,29) discussed the reliability of Kovarik's (2012) Zimbabwean record, but apparently missed the point about the Zambezi River, as he did not mention the other two localities, and went on to describe Pandinurus (P.) prendinii Rossi, 2015, from a single female, allegedly from Messina in the Limpopo Province of South Africa. Prendini (2016: 57) synonymized P prendinii with Pandinurus (P) sudanicus (Hirst, 1911) on the grounds that the meristic data listed as diagnostic for P prendinii fall entirely within the ranges given for P sudanicus.…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While phylogenetic comparative methods are a relatively recent approach to understanding venom variation [ 26 ], studies measuring venom potencies have a rich history, with numerous standardized measures of potencies, such as LD 50 , available across species spanning the scorpion phylogeny. Here, we use this rich history to collate LD 50 potency values [ 20 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ] and morphology measures [ 14 , 19 , 35 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 ,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%