2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2015.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scour depth under pipelines placed on weakly cohesive soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(55 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This response also aligned with the international survey by Lohnes et al (2001), which concluded that floodway constructions on loess (sedimentary soils) should be avoided due to its increased erosive potential. Furthermore, it aligns with various sources of literature such as Postacchini and Brocchini (2015) who explain that the action of scour and particle movement within cohesive and non‐cohesive soils is vastly different. The movement threshold for non‐cohesive granular sediments is a product of particle size, density, shape, packing, and orientation, while erosion within non‐cohesive sediments is reliant on shear stress, shear strength, and also the chemical and physical bonding of soil particles (Najafzadeh et al, 2013).…”
Section: Industry Surveysupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This response also aligned with the international survey by Lohnes et al (2001), which concluded that floodway constructions on loess (sedimentary soils) should be avoided due to its increased erosive potential. Furthermore, it aligns with various sources of literature such as Postacchini and Brocchini (2015) who explain that the action of scour and particle movement within cohesive and non‐cohesive soils is vastly different. The movement threshold for non‐cohesive granular sediments is a product of particle size, density, shape, packing, and orientation, while erosion within non‐cohesive sediments is reliant on shear stress, shear strength, and also the chemical and physical bonding of soil particles (Najafzadeh et al, 2013).…”
Section: Industry Surveysupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Laboratory experiment studies have focused on the onset of scour [2,3], tunnel and lee-wake erosion [4], the mechanism of three-dimensional scour hole development [5,6], the spanwise scour propagation rate [7][8][9], and the equilibrium scour depth [10]. Numerical simulation has also been widely used in the investigations on the aspects above [11][12][13][14]. Other literature has addressed scour protection measures [15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sci. 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 11 been widely used in the investigations on the aspects above [11][12][13][14]. Other literature has addressed scour protection measures [15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many investigations have focused on the two-dimensional scour under a pipeline, wherein the currents or waves are assumed to propagate towards the pipeline perpendicularly and the properties of the pipeline and the sediment are supposed to be identical along the pipeline [2]. These investigations have focused on the mechanism of the onset of scour [3,4], the equilibrium scour depth [5][6][7], the time scale of tunnel erosion [8][9][10], and field observations and tests [11,12]. Numerical simulation is also widely adopted in researches on the two-dimensional scour hole development process [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%