2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2015.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scouts, forests, and ticks: Impact of landscapes on human-tick contacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One survey, of 568 soldiers at an outdoor training base in Germany, recorded 710 tick bites during April–September 2009, a mean incidence rate of 2.3 bites/1,000 person-days ( 20 ). More recently, a survey of 931 scouts attending summer camps in Belgium yielded a mean incidence rate of 22.8 tick bites/1,000 person-days ( 21 ). Both of these incidence rates are markedly lower than that reported in the current study, which equates to 677 bites/1,000 competitor-days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One survey, of 568 soldiers at an outdoor training base in Germany, recorded 710 tick bites during April–September 2009, a mean incidence rate of 2.3 bites/1,000 person-days ( 20 ). More recently, a survey of 931 scouts attending summer camps in Belgium yielded a mean incidence rate of 22.8 tick bites/1,000 person-days ( 21 ). Both of these incidence rates are markedly lower than that reported in the current study, which equates to 677 bites/1,000 competitor-days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, in the study in Germany, >95% of all tick bites occurred during 3 of the 6 months (April–September) surveyed ( 20 ). Also, in Belgium, marked differences in incidence rates were observed between camps; a range of 0–97.9 bites/1,000 person-days were recorded ( 21 ). None of the 3 surveys under discussion included accurate estimates of questing tick densities at the survey sites; however, given that the questing tick densities at the 3 LAMM sites surveyed were not unusually high (mean of 189 ticks/person-hour, which equates to 98/100 m 2 ( 23 ), it is unlikely that the ≈100-fold variation in mean incidence rate of tick bites between our study and that of Faulde et al ( 20 ) is solely a reflection of variation in local tick abundance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our model showed the negative effect of ecotone between arable land and grasslands on the risk of seropositivity. Arable land is considered the most unfavorable agricultural habitat for ticks because of drastic changes in plant cover and soil management throughout a year (4, 37). But we know that the occurrence of ticks is influenced by the neighboring habitat (38): a contact between grassland and woodland is more favorable than a contact between grassland and arable lands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because we do not know the date of infection, we considered the mean game density over the 2002–2011 period. As in previous work (4, 16) and using dasymetric mapping (19) and equation 1, an estimation of the density of red deer, roe deer, and wild boar at the municipality level was obtained. The density of these animals shot by municipality was also calculated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation