2023
DOI: 10.1002/ima.22873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BUS‐CAD: A computer‐aided diagnosis system for breast tumor classification in ultrasound images using grid‐search‐optimized machine learning algorithms with extended and Boruta‐selected features

Abstract: Breast cancer has become the most prominent type of cancer in the world. Early detection of breast cancer plays an important role in optimal treatment planning to decrease mortality. Breast ultrasound is widely used in diagnosing breast masses. Applications of machine learning in ultrasound imaging‐based classification have shown promising potential for early and accurate detection of breast cancer. In this study, a new computer‐aided diagnosis system based on machine learning techniques for breast cancer clas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BUSI A multiscale CNN classification model comprising 21 layers for classification, an autoencoder-based u-shaped DDA-Net segmentation model 97.89% 2. UDIAT Özcan ( 2023 ) BUSI BUS − CAD. Hybrid feature representation with global and local texture statistics, feature selection.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…BUSI A multiscale CNN classification model comprising 21 layers for classification, an autoencoder-based u-shaped DDA-Net segmentation model 97.89% 2. UDIAT Özcan ( 2023 ) BUSI BUS − CAD. Hybrid feature representation with global and local texture statistics, feature selection.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the time complexity for these models is much higher than our proposed model. (Özcan 2023 ) introduced a BUS−CAD system that includes global and textural-based feature statistics, feature selection and machine learning classification, achieved an accuracy of 97.81%. When compared with the test accuracies of the prior studies, it is evident that our proposed model has obtained the highest accuracy of 99.48%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they employed the transfer learning idea and concentrated on the pre-trained models (i.e., VGG16 (24), Alexnet (25), ResNet (24), MobileNet (26), and EfficienctNet ( 27)). For training purposes, those models need a large and well-balanced dataset of images; however, the publicly accessible breast cancer dataset is insufficient (28). In addition, the extraction of irrelevant feature extraction decreased the classification accuracy and increased the computation time (second).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%