2021
DOI: 10.1002/dc.24863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COVID‐19 post‐vaccination lymphadenopathy: Report of cytological findings from fine needle aspiration biopsy

Abstract: The coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic has spurred the rapid development of vaccines, with vaccination programmes already underway in many countries. Regional lymphadenopathy is one of the documented side effects of vaccination. We document the fine needle aspiration cytological findings of an enlarged supraclavicular lymph node in a 34-year-old Asian female following the first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, which appears to be the first such report in a premorbidly well patient with no known hi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…KFD very uncommonly occurs following vaccination, with only rare reports in the literature describing its occurrence after influenza vaccination [7], human papillomavirus vaccination and Japanese encephalitis virus vaccination [8]. A literature search yielded only one case report of KFD following COVID-19 vaccination at the time of writing [3], with many other papers describing cytologic or histologic findings of reactive follicular hyperplasia or reactive lymphadenopathy [9][10][11][12][13][14]. Table 1 details the key features of published cases of lymphadenopathy post COVID-19 vaccination, which also had cytologic and/or histologic follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KFD very uncommonly occurs following vaccination, with only rare reports in the literature describing its occurrence after influenza vaccination [7], human papillomavirus vaccination and Japanese encephalitis virus vaccination [8]. A literature search yielded only one case report of KFD following COVID-19 vaccination at the time of writing [3], with many other papers describing cytologic or histologic findings of reactive follicular hyperplasia or reactive lymphadenopathy [9][10][11][12][13][14]. Table 1 details the key features of published cases of lymphadenopathy post COVID-19 vaccination, which also had cytologic and/or histologic follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After excluding 74 articles for the reasons stated in Figure 1 , and with the addition of 5 articles identified from the reference lists of articles, 39 articles were included in this review and 21 COVID-19 studies were included in the pooled analysis. A total of 25 studies [ 18 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 ] were relevant to the COVID-19 vaccine and 14 studies [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 ] were related to non-COVID-19 vaccines.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 25 studies were published by authors from countries including Germany [ 18 ] ( n = 1), Israel [ 22 , 37 ] ( n = 2), Japan [ 26 ] ( n = 1), Portugal [ 20 ] ( n = 1), Qatar [ 31 ] ( n = 1), Singapore [ 32 , 33 ] ( n = 2), South Korea [ 27 , 30 , 39 ] ( n = 3), Spain [ 23 , 24 , 41 ] ( n = 3), Switzerland [ 21 ] ( n = 1), the United Kingdom [ 36 ] (UK) ( n = 1), and the United States of America [ 25 , 28 , 29 , 34 , 35 , 38 , 40 , 43 ] (USA) ( n = 8). Most studies are case reports ( n = 12, 48.0%), followed by case series ( n = 9, 36.0%), retrospective studies ( n = 3, 12.0%), and not reported in one study (4.0%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to daily practice, nodes with aggregate positivity were further investigated by US or mdc CT, at least [26]. This approach avoided undue further investigations for most of patients and unnecessary invasive procedures [27] for those supposed positive. In fact, 84% of patients suspected positive on PET scan resulted to have benign features on co-recorded CT images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%