2009
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.08.2186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

d-Dimers and Efficacy of Clinical Risk Estimation Algorithms: Sensitivity in Evaluation of Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Abstract: The data appear to support the use of a quantitative D-dimer assay as a first-line test in evaluation for pulmonary embolism when the clinical probability of the presence of pulmonary embolism is low or intermediate. The sensitivity and negative predictive value were 100% for these cases. More than 26% of CT angiographic examinations might have been avoided if the D-dimer assay had been used as a first-line test in the care of patients at low or intermediate risk. Because of the small sample size, the D-dimer … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings in one study ( 21 ) suggest that D -dimer levels should be attained in patients with low or intermediate risk for PE. Radiation exposure is a growing and important issue with CT angiographic studies (22)(23)(24)(25). The mean measured effective dose by using 64-section CT angiography is 19.9 mSv 6 1.38 per study, which is based on a phantom design ( 11 ).…”
Section: -Dimer Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings in one study ( 21 ) suggest that D -dimer levels should be attained in patients with low or intermediate risk for PE. Radiation exposure is a growing and important issue with CT angiographic studies (22)(23)(24)(25). The mean measured effective dose by using 64-section CT angiography is 19.9 mSv 6 1.38 per study, which is based on a phantom design ( 11 ).…”
Section: -Dimer Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, D-dimer was the most sensitive biomarker for APE, with 85.1% sensitivity and 78.8% negative predictive value. Although D-dimer values may be used to exclude PE in patients with either a low or a moderate probability of PE, measurement of D-dimer is not useful for confirming PE [22][23][24][25]. Copeptin may be used to support the need for further investigations with moderate specificity and positive predictive value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although D-dimers should only be applied to patients suspected of PE after assessment of pretest clinical probability (16,17), we applied the age-adjusted D-dimer strategies to all patients who received CTPA in our retrospective cohort to maximize generalizability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%