2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-5013.2005.20204.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishing Primary Headache Disorders from Cervicogenic Headache: Clinical and Therapeutic Implications

Abstract: The objectives of this article are to encapsulate the literature on the clinical aspects of cervicogenic headache, in order to help readers understand how cervicogenic headache can be distinguished from other primary headaches, and how it might be treated. Cervicogenic headache has evolved as a contentious and controversial entity. Tensions have developed concerning how it should be diagnosed, and if it at all exists as an entity. The literature is summarized and appraised in the form of a narrative review. Tw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diagnostic significance of an isolated feature of musculoskeletal impairment has rightly been questioned because of the potential normal variability in a single measure such as range of movement (14, 15). To date, there has been no clinical sign or set of signs that has been helpful for diagnosis (44). Classically, musculoskeletal disorders are characterized by a pattern of coexisting impairments in the articular and muscular systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnostic significance of an isolated feature of musculoskeletal impairment has rightly been questioned because of the potential normal variability in a single measure such as range of movement (14, 15). To date, there has been no clinical sign or set of signs that has been helpful for diagnosis (44). Classically, musculoskeletal disorders are characterized by a pattern of coexisting impairments in the articular and muscular systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Headache, if asked for, is frequently reported by patients with cervical radiculopathy but in general not discussed in terms of nerve root compression in the lower cervical spine. On the other hand, affection of nerve structures in the upper cervical spine, including the C2 and C3 nerve roots and the occipital major nerve, are accepted as a cause of occipital headache [8]. The term cervicogenic headache [34], is often mentioned in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are multiple sets of diagnostic criteria as well as differing opinions about the role of interventional approaches in diagnosis and treatment. As noted above, the clinical criteria for cervicogenic headache suffer from poor interrater reliability and specificity with regard to range of motion and precipitation by external pressure [6]. On the interventional end of the diagnostic spectrum, the IHS criteria for the diagnosis of cervicogenic headache include abolition of pain via blockade of nerves that innervate responsible cervical lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Purely clinical diagnostic criteria for cervicogenic headache include unilateral pain, reduced range of neck movement, ipsilateral shoulder and arm discomfort, and mechanical precipitation of attacks by awkward neck positions or external pressure against occipital structures [5]. These criteria, however, have poor interrater reliability and specificity [6,7]. Others argue that in order to attain validity, a cervical source of the pain must be identified via diagnostic blocks [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%