2015
DOI: 10.1111/iej.12577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA double‐strand breaks caused by new and contemporary endodontic sealers

Abstract: New BioRoot RCS was not toxic whilst Hybrid Root SEAL demonstrated more toxicity and DNA double-strand breaks when compared with other resin- and silicate-based root canal sealers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
51
0
9

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(140 reference statements)
2
51
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers have been recently introduced and shown to produce appropriate biological responses (Eldeniz et al 2016, Prati & Gandolfi 2015. These bioactive sealers represent a new concept in root filling, and their interaction with periapical tissues is considered important (Costa et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers have been recently introduced and shown to produce appropriate biological responses (Eldeniz et al 2016, Prati & Gandolfi 2015. These bioactive sealers represent a new concept in root filling, and their interaction with periapical tissues is considered important (Costa et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Endoseal MTA is another type of MTA-based root canal sealer, the composition and particle size of different MTAs are not the same. Recently, Bioroot BC Sealer (Septodont, Saint-Maur-des-Fosses, France) was demonstrated to show good biocompatibility with periodontal ligament cells (Camps et al 2015, Eldeniz et al 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paste B includes silicon dioxide, titanium dioxide, and base resin (pentaerythritol, rosinate, and toluene sulphonamide), and 13.2% set MTA particles as filler. The working time is 23 min, with a complete set time of approximately 2 h. Several properties of this root canal sealer, such as flow and viscosity [10, 11], dimensional change [11], material porosity [12, 13], sealing ability [11], radiopacity, electrical conductivity [14], antibacterial effect [15], biocompatibility [1620], cytotoxicity [19, 2123], and genotoxicity [24, 25], have been investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BioRoot RCS has a minimum working time of 10 min and a maximum setting time of 4 h. This silicate-based root canal sealer has less toxic effects on human periodontal ligament cells than zinc oxide-eugenol sealer and induces a higher secretion of angiogenic and osteogenic growth factors than ZOE [27]. BioRoot RCS compared to contemporary root canal sealers (AHPlus, Acroseal, EndoRez, RealSeal SE, Hybrid Root SEAL, RootSP, and MTA Fillapex) has the lower cytotoxicity and genotoxicity [24]. The sealing properties of BioRoot RCS combined with gutta-percha are comparable to those of AHPlus, but microCT has revealed a higher void volume for BioRoot RCS than resin-based sealer, possibly due to the shorter working time and less flow than AHPlus [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several other factors such as the choice of instruments for root canal shaping 7 and root canal sealers for root canal filling 8 are associated with post‐operative pain after root canal treatment. Calcium silicate‐based sealers have been shown to be less cytotoxic 9,10 and promote pulpal 11 and periapical 12 healing. Therefore, they are expected to induce lesser post‐operative pain compared to resin‐based sealers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%