2020
DOI: 10.1002/cpa.21924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite‐Rank Perturbations of Random Band Matrices via Infinitesimal Free Probability

Abstract: We prove a sharp p N transition for the infinitesimal distribution of a periodically banded GUE matrix. For bandwidths b N h .p N /, we further prove that our model is infinitesimally free from the matrix units and the normalized all-1's matrix. Our results allow us to extend previous work of Shlyakhtenko on finite-rank perturbations of Wigner matrices in the infinitesimal framework. For finite-rank perturbations of our model, we find outliers at the classical positions from the deformed Wigner ensemble.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [Shl18], using a different line of arguments, including concentration results on large unitary groups, Shlyakhtenko gave a short elegant proof of asymptotic infinitesimal freeness in expectation of a family of unitarily invariant matrices from a tuple of finite rank matrices, and, proved besides, with explicit Gaussian computations, the asymptotic infinitesimal freeness in expectation of a family of independent GUE matrices from a tuple of finite rank matrices. This result has been generalized in three directions: Collins, Hasebe and Sakuma proved in [CHS18] the almost sure asymptotic infinitesimal freeness of a family of unitarily invariant matrices from a tuple of finite rank matrices, which can also be stated asymptotically as cyclic monotone independence; Dallaporta and Février proved in [DF19, Appendix A] that a family of independent GUE matrices is asymptotically infinitesimal free in expectation from a tuple of bounded deterministic matrices converging in * -distribution; and Au proved in [Au21] the asymptotic infinitesimal freeness in expectation of a family of Wigner matrices with finite moments from a tuple of finite rank matrices, and of a family of periodically banded GUE matrix from a tuple of finite rank matrices. Finally, the asymptotic infinitesimal freeness in expectation of two independent random matrices, at least one of them being unitarily invariant, is also a consequence of the general theory of surfaced free probability of Borot, Charbonnier, Garcia-Failde, Leid and Shadrin in [BCGF + 21] (it corresponds to ( 1 2 , 1)-freeness in [BCGF + 21, Theorem 4.28]).…”
Section: Introduction 1infinitesimal Freeness For Random Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [Shl18], using a different line of arguments, including concentration results on large unitary groups, Shlyakhtenko gave a short elegant proof of asymptotic infinitesimal freeness in expectation of a family of unitarily invariant matrices from a tuple of finite rank matrices, and, proved besides, with explicit Gaussian computations, the asymptotic infinitesimal freeness in expectation of a family of independent GUE matrices from a tuple of finite rank matrices. This result has been generalized in three directions: Collins, Hasebe and Sakuma proved in [CHS18] the almost sure asymptotic infinitesimal freeness of a family of unitarily invariant matrices from a tuple of finite rank matrices, which can also be stated asymptotically as cyclic monotone independence; Dallaporta and Février proved in [DF19, Appendix A] that a family of independent GUE matrices is asymptotically infinitesimal free in expectation from a tuple of bounded deterministic matrices converging in * -distribution; and Au proved in [Au21] the asymptotic infinitesimal freeness in expectation of a family of Wigner matrices with finite moments from a tuple of finite rank matrices, and of a family of periodically banded GUE matrix from a tuple of finite rank matrices. Finally, the asymptotic infinitesimal freeness in expectation of two independent random matrices, at least one of them being unitarily invariant, is also a consequence of the general theory of surfaced free probability of Borot, Charbonnier, Garcia-Failde, Leid and Shadrin in [BCGF + 21] (it corresponds to ( 1 2 , 1)-freeness in [BCGF + 21, Theorem 4.28]).…”
Section: Introduction 1infinitesimal Freeness For Random Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…N ) i∈I converge in traffic distribution to a semicircular traffic family of covariance [Au18,Au20] for additional work on Wigner matrices and their generalizations in the traffic framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%