2018
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene expression differences among different MSI statuses in colorectal cancer

Abstract: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in males and second in females. This disease can be caused by genetic and acquired/environmental factors. Microsatellite instability (MSI) is one of the major mechanisms in colorectal cancer. This mechanism is a specific condition of genetic hyper mutability that results from incompetent DNA mismatch repair. MSI has been applied to classify different colorectal cancer subtypes. However, the effects of MSI status on gene expression are largely unknown. In our st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TMB and MSI are used as biomarkers to evaluate the therapeutic effect of PD-1 antibody and microsatellite instability is also one of the tumor progression [11,12]. We found that the expression level of CBLL1 was correlated with TMB in patients with BLCA, BRCA, COAD, LAML, LGG, LUAD, LUSC, SARC, STAD, THCA, THYM and UVM, and with MSI in patients with ACC, BRCA, CESC, COAD, DLBC, HNSC, PRAD, READ, SARC, STAD, TGCT, THCA and UCEC, which indicates that CBLL1 may be a biomarker of treatment and prognosis in patients with pan-cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TMB and MSI are used as biomarkers to evaluate the therapeutic effect of PD-1 antibody and microsatellite instability is also one of the tumor progression [11,12]. We found that the expression level of CBLL1 was correlated with TMB in patients with BLCA, BRCA, COAD, LAML, LGG, LUAD, LUSC, SARC, STAD, THCA, THYM and UVM, and with MSI in patients with ACC, BRCA, CESC, COAD, DLBC, HNSC, PRAD, READ, SARC, STAD, TGCT, THCA and UCEC, which indicates that CBLL1 may be a biomarker of treatment and prognosis in patients with pan-cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we adopted a mutual information-based method, i.e., mRMR (Peng et al, 2005), which has been widely used in feature ranking (Niu et al, 2013; Zhao et al, 2013; Zhou et al, 2015; Zhang et al, 2016; Li and Huang, 2017; Liu et al, 2017). It considers both the relevance between features and sample labels and the redundancy among features and has been proven to be an effective feature selection method, especially for gene expression analysis (Qin et al, 2012; Zhang et al, 2014b, 2017, 2018; Zhang Y. et al, 2014; Li et al, 2015; Zhou et al, 2015; Wang et al, 2016; Song et al, 2017; Chen et al, 2018b). The method works like this: let us use Ω to denote all the 25,159 genes, Ω s to denote the selected gene set that includes m genes, and Ω g to denote the n genes that will be evaluated, and one of them will be selected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do that, the minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) method [ 12 ] proposed by Peng et al was employed to analyze all the features and yield a feature list, named the mRMR feature list. This feature selection method has been applied to tackle various biological problems [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. In the method, the discriminated power of a feature f is reflected by the relevance between it and a target class c , which is measured from their mutual information ( MI ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%