2018
DOI: 10.1111/ggr.12239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GZ7 and GZ8 – Two Zircon Reference Materials for SIMS U‐Pb Geochronology

Abstract: Here, we document a detailed characterisation of two zircon gemstones, GZ7 and GZ8. Both stones had the same mass at 19.2 carats (3.84 g) each; both came from placer deposits in the Ratnapura district, Sri Lanka. The U‐Pb data are in both cases concordant within the uncertainties of decay constants and yield weighted mean 206Pb/238U ages (95% confidence uncertainty) of 530.26 Ma ± 0.05 Ma (GZ7) and 543.92 Ma ± 0.06 Ma (GZ8). Neither GZ7 nor GZ8 have been subjected to any gem enhancement by heating. Structure‐r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
(221 reference statements)
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the seller informed us that the SA01 zircon megacryst was collected from the KwaZulu‐Natal Province, South Africa, zircons with similar geochemical features have not been found in KwaZulu‐Natal so far. As shown in Table , SA01 is quite different from the now fairly large suite of similar aged Sri Lankan zircons that have been published [SL7 (Kinny et al ), CZ3 (Pidgeon et al , Xu et al , Cavosie et al ), M257 (Nasdala et al , Li et al , Hu et al ), BR266 (Stern , Woodhead et al , Liu et al ), BB9 (Santos et al ), GZ7/GZ8 (Nasdala et al ), M127 (Nasdala et al ) and LGC‐1 (Tian et al )]. In this regard, the genesis of the SA01 zircon megacryst may be different from those of the Sri Lankan zircon megacrysts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Although the seller informed us that the SA01 zircon megacryst was collected from the KwaZulu‐Natal Province, South Africa, zircons with similar geochemical features have not been found in KwaZulu‐Natal so far. As shown in Table , SA01 is quite different from the now fairly large suite of similar aged Sri Lankan zircons that have been published [SL7 (Kinny et al ), CZ3 (Pidgeon et al , Xu et al , Cavosie et al ), M257 (Nasdala et al , Li et al , Hu et al ), BR266 (Stern , Woodhead et al , Liu et al ), BB9 (Santos et al ), GZ7/GZ8 (Nasdala et al ), M127 (Nasdala et al ) and LGC‐1 (Tian et al )]. In this regard, the genesis of the SA01 zircon megacryst may be different from those of the Sri Lankan zircon megacrysts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In spite of significant differences in trace element mass fractions, different SA01 zircon shards are characterised by consistent chondrite‐normalised REE patterns, namely depletion in LREE, enrichment in HREE, positive Ce anomaly and negligible Eu anomaly. Compared with the widely used zircon reference materials 91500 (Wiedenbeck et al ), Mud Tank (Woodhead and Hergt ), CZ‐3 (Pidgeon et al ), OG1 (Stern et al , Kemp et al ), Temora (Black et al ), Plešovice (Slama et al , Ver Hoeve et al ), GJ‐1 (Jackson et al , Piazolo et al ), GZ7/GZ8 (Nasdala et al ) and Qinghu (Li et al ), SA01 zircon is distinct with high Ti mass fractions and Th/U ratios (Figure f; Kirkland et al ). It is very common that zircons crystallised in alkaline magmas have high Ti mass fractions and high Th/U ratios (Fu et al , Peng et al , Zhu et al ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations