2017
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.27253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hemodynamic analysis of a novel bioresorbable scaffold in porcine coronary artery model

Abstract: Thinner strut Mirage scaffolds induced lower shear stress due to the small size vessels treated as compared to the thick strut version of the Mirage which was implanted in relatively bigger size vessels. Vessel size should be taken into account in planning BRS implantation. Small vessels may not get benefit from BRS implantation even with a streamlined strut profile. This pilot study warrants comparative assessment with commercially available bioresorbable scaffolds.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect is greatest in sutured simulations when compared to a pristine vessel, and more pronounced with realistic pulsatile flow than a sinusoidal approximation. To date, similar findings have not been reported in the body of literature available, indeed our findings are in contrast to those reported by Tenekecioglu [37,64] when evaluating coronary stent haemodynamics, where no significant difference in endothelial shear rates were seen between steady and pulsatile flows. Similar findings were also reported in a further study evaluating coronary stents [41], although this paper describes timeaveraged values which may influence the conclusion somewhat.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This effect is greatest in sutured simulations when compared to a pristine vessel, and more pronounced with realistic pulsatile flow than a sinusoidal approximation. To date, similar findings have not been reported in the body of literature available, indeed our findings are in contrast to those reported by Tenekecioglu [37,64] when evaluating coronary stent haemodynamics, where no significant difference in endothelial shear rates were seen between steady and pulsatile flows. Similar findings were also reported in a further study evaluating coronary stents [41], although this paper describes timeaveraged values which may influence the conclusion somewhat.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Although well executed, these studies have not examined the influence of clinically representative sutures at the anastomosis, particularly in the context of realistic pulsatile flows. There have however been studies examining both steady [37] and time-dependent [38,39,40,41] blood flows in other vessels throughout the body. Of particular interest was the work of Perdikaris [39] where a range of approaches to simulating cerebral flows was discussed, including the use of dissipative particle dynamics (DPD) to simulate thrombus formation [42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation