Walruses (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus) occur in Canada from James Bay to Smith Sound and from the Canada-Greenland international boundary in Davis Strait to the longitudinal center of Canada (Fig. 1). Within this range, walruses are subdivided into seven stocks based on summering areas for the purpose of making management decisions that affect walrus and walrus habitat (Stewart 2008). Stock assessments (e.g. Breiwik and York 2009, Lugten 2010) rely on identifying units that can be managed without impact on other units. In the absence of definitive information, it is more precautionary to assume greater subdivision than exists in nature rather than to assume less (Taylor 1997, Taylor andDizon 1999). However, overly conservative subdivision can lead stock managers to overestimate the risk of stock extirpation, potentially leading to negative effects on resource users.
NAMMCO Scientific Publications
PS-LS), North Foxe Basin (N-FB), Central Foxe Basin (C-FB), Hudson Bay Davis Strait (HB-DS) and Southern and EasternHudson Bay (SE-HB). In this study, walrus were sampled from six of the seven stocks (SE-HB samples were not available) and genotyped at 10 microsatellite loci. All stocks were genetically diverse (average heterozygosity of 0.58) with no evidence of inbreeding (average F IS of 0.03). We detected significant genetic differentiation among the stocks and a pattern of genetic spatial autocorrelation that suggests a moderate effect of geographic distance on gene flow among stocks. Bayesian clustering suggested the six recognized stocks were elements of two larger genetic clusters-a northern Arctic population (containing BB, WJS, and PS-LS stocks) and a central Arctic population (containing C-FB, N-FB, and HB-DS stocks). These populations are moderately differentiated (F ST = 0.07), but based on evidence of contemporary movement from assignment tests, are not completely isolated. There was support for maintaining the WJS stock and a combined BB+PS-LS stock, although the latter conclusion is based on a small sample size. Similarly, there was some evidence suggesting separation of the Foxe Basin stocks from the HB-DS but not the N-FB from the C-FB stock. However, given that there are morphological and chemical differences between N-FB and C-FB stocks, there is currently insufficient evidence to support a revision of the current stock designations.